Bug #2199

Object#method should call respond_to_missing?(sym, true)

Added by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) over 2 years ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:Closed Start date:10/13/2009
Priority:Normal Due date:
Assignee:matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) % Done:

0%
Category:core
Target version:1.9.2
ruby -v:ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-10-13 trunk 25317) [x86_64-darwin10.0.0]

Description

Is there any reason I'm missing?

  class A
    def respond_to_missing?(method, private = false)
      method == :is_private && private
    end

    def is_private2
    end
    private :is_private2
  end

  A.new.method(:is_private2) # ==> #<Method: A#is_private2>...
  A.new.method(:is_private) # ==> NameError: undefined method `is_private' for class `A'


If not:

diff --git a/proc.c b/proc.c
index 5ed3c01..b7c632c 100644
--- a/proc.c
+++ b/proc.c
@@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ mnew(VALUE klass, VALUE obj, ID id, VALUE mclass, int scope)
        VALUE sym = ID2SYM(id);

        if (obj != Qundef && !rb_method_basic_definition_p(klass, rmiss)) {
-           if (RTEST(rb_funcall(obj, rmiss, 1, sym))) {
+           if (RTEST(rb_funcall(obj, rmiss, 2, sym, Qtrue))) {
                def = ALLOC(rb_method_definition_t);
                def->type = VM_METHOD_TYPE_MISSING;
                def->original_id = id;

History

#1
Updated by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) over 2 years ago

  • Subject changed from Object#method should call respond_to_missing(sym, true) to Object#method should call respond_to_missing?(sym, true)
  • Assignee set to matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

#2
Updated by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Closed
Applied in r25325.

Also available in: Atom PDF