Bug #864
String#include? regexp
| Status: | Rejected | Start date: | 12/13/2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% |
|
| Category: | core | |||
| Target version: | 1.9.0-5 | |||
| ruby -v: |
Description
For consistency, String#include? should be able to take a regexp as an argument. I realize that the return value of String#index(regexp) and String#match(regexp) could be used, but String#include?(regexp) would be both more readable and less resource-intensive.
History
Updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto about 3 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Rejected
"readable" is subjective. For me, strings do not "include" patterns.