https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/favicon.ico?17113305112021-04-29T19:02:44ZRuby Issue Tracking SystemRuby master - Bug #17841: The first instance of SortedSet doesn't sort when rbtree is presenthttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17841?journal_id=917602021-04-29T19:02:44Zjeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans)merch-redmine@jeremyevans.net
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Backport</strong> changed from <i>2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN</i> to <i>2.6: DONTNEED, 2.7: REQUIRED, 3.0: DONTNEED</i></li></ul><p>This is probably caused by the fix to <a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-4 priority-default closed" title="Bug: SortedSet's lazy setup causes unpredictable behaviour in subclass's initialize (Closed)" href="https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15830">#15830</a>. Here's a pull request that should fix it: <a href="https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4432" class="external">https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4432</a>, though I didn't test with rbtree. Closing and marking for backport.</p> Ruby master - Bug #17841: The first instance of SortedSet doesn't sort when rbtree is presenthttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17841?journal_id=930662021-07-31T12:29:22Zusa (Usaku NAKAMURA)usa@garbagecollect.jp
<ul><li><strong>Backport</strong> changed from <i>2.6: DONTNEED, 2.7: REQUIRED, 3.0: DONTNEED</i> to <i>2.6: DONTNEED, 2.7: DONE, 3.0: DONTNEED</i></li></ul><p>merged into ruby_2_7 at 2a7235421fcd59b449c84306d059f22b4c5f0865</p>