https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/favicon.ico?17097754782011-11-01T12:56:02ZRuby Issue Tracking SystemRuby master - Bug #5508: Is BigDecimal really not $SAFE?https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5508?journal_id=217532011-11-01T12:56:02Zmrkn (Kenta Murata)muraken@gmail.com
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>mrkn (Kenta Murata)</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>2.0.0</i></li></ul> Ruby master - Bug #5508: Is BigDecimal really not $SAFE?https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5508?journal_id=247742012-03-18T18:46:04Zshyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)shyouhei@ruby-lang.org
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Assigned</i></li></ul> Ruby master - Bug #5508: Is BigDecimal really not $SAFE?https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5508?journal_id=343212012-12-03T00:09:51Zmrkn (Kenta Murata)muraken@gmail.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Assigned</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>100</i></li></ul><p>This issue was solved with changeset r38147.<br>
Dmitry, thank you for reporting this issue.<br>
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.<br>
May Ruby be with you.</p>
<hr>
<ul>
<li>ext/bigdecimal/bigdecimal.c (BigDecimal_new): stop checking string<br>
taintness. [Bug <a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-4 priority-default closed" title="Bug: Is BigDecimal really not $SAFE? (Closed)" href="https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5508">#5508</a>] <a href="/issues/5508">[ruby-core:40510]</a></li>
</ul>