Backport #6190

String#encode return string containing invalid chars but marked as valid

Added by Pierre PLR about 2 years ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

[ruby-core:43557]
Status:Closed
Priority:Normal
Assignee:Yui NARUSE

Description

a = " \xE9 ".encode('UTF-8', 'UTF-8', :invalid => :replace, :replace => "?")
a.valid_encoding?
=> true
a
=> " \xE9 "
a.squeeze
ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in UTF-8
from (irb):32:in squeeze'
from (irb):32
from /usr/bin/irb:12:in
'

The expected string is " ? ", as the documentation for the ":replace" options says :
If the value is :replace, encode replaces invalid byte sequences in str with the replacement character.

Associated revisions

Revision 40056
Added by Usaku NAKAMURA about 1 year ago

merge revision(s) 35112,35121: [Backport #6190]

* transcode.c (str_encode_bang, encoded_dup): if nothing was
  transcoded, just set encoding but leave coderange unchanged as
  forcee_encoding.  [Bug #6190]

* transcode.c (documentation for str_encode): Explain
  that transcoding to the same encoding is a no-op
  (i.e. no exceptions, no replacements,...).
  [Bug #6190]

History

#1 Updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada about 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Closed
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

This issue was solved with changeset r35112.
Pierre, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.


  • transcode.c (strencodebang, encodeddup): if nothing was transcoded, just set encoding but leave coderange unchanged as forceeencoding. [Bug #6190]

#2 Updated by Martin Dürst about 2 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

pplr (Pierre PLR) wrote:

a = " \xE9 ".encode('UTF-8', 'UTF-8', :invalid => :replace, :replace => "?")
a.valid_encoding?
=> true

Nobu fixed this so it won't return true anymore, which would be a lie.

a
=> " \xE9 "

The expected string is " ? ", as the documentation for the ":replace" options says :
If the value is :replace, encode replaces invalid byte sequences in str with the replacement character.

I added documentation to say that encoding from encoding A to the same encoding A is a no-op. Changing this would not be impossible, but would involve quite some work, and would make these operations slower.

#3 Updated by Yui NARUSE about 1 year ago

  • Tracker changed from Bug to Backport
  • Project changed from ruby-trunk to Backport93

#4 Updated by Yui NARUSE about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Closed to Assigned

#5 Updated by Zachary Scott about 1 year ago

  • Assignee set to Yui NARUSE

naruse-san what do you want for this ticket?

#6 Updated by Usaku NAKAMURA about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to Closed

This issue was solved with changeset r40056.
Pierre, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.


merge revision(s) 35112,35121: [Backport #6190]

* transcode.c (str_encode_bang, encoded_dup): if nothing was
  transcoded, just set encoding but leave coderange unchanged as
  forcee_encoding.  [Bug #6190]

* transcode.c (documentation for str_encode): Explain
  that transcoding to the same encoding is a no-op
  (i.e. no exceptions, no replacements,...).
  [Bug #6190]

Also available in: Atom PDF