https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/favicon.ico?17113305112013-02-22T09:04:14ZRuby Issue Tracking SystemRuby master - Feature #7907: Give meaning to staby wordhttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7907?journal_id=367312013-02-22T09:04:14Zko1 (Koichi Sasada)
<ul><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/36731/diff?detail_id=26191">diff</a>)</li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)</i></li></ul> Ruby master - Feature #7907: Give meaning to staby wordhttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7907?journal_id=367622013-02-22T12:10:06Zmatz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)matz@ruby.or.jp
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Rejected</i></li></ul><p>=begin<br>
I think filling the syntax hole eagerly is a bad idea.</p>
<p>Besides that, I don't think making ((%->foo%)) as method(:foo).to_proc seems a good idea,<br>
since foo in ((%->foo{}%)) is a argument name, not a method name.</p>
<p>Matz.<br>
=end</p> Ruby master - Feature #7907: Give meaning to staby wordhttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7907?journal_id=367682013-02-22T12:59:07Ztrans (Thomas Sawyer)
<ul></ul><p>Ah, <code>->foo{}</code> did not know that the parenthesis could be left out.</p>
<p>Ok, I'll suggest slight modification then, b/c it still would be nice to have a shorter notation (not just to fill a syntax hole). Could it be a symbol, i.e. <code>->:foo</code>.</p> Ruby master - Feature #7907: Give meaning to staby wordhttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7907?journal_id=367902013-02-22T23:49:29Ztrans (Thomas Sawyer)
<ul></ul><p>Once a issue has been rejected, is it necessary to open a new case for a modified form of the proposal? In other words is any one going to see the change if it has already been rejected? As with this case?</p> Ruby master - Feature #7907: Give meaning to staby wordhttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7907?journal_id=367962013-02-23T02:05:29Zrosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)rr.rosas@gmail.com
<ul></ul><p>People will see the changes but when they're looking for open issues to decide what to do about them they won't touch closed issues :)</p>