https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/favicon.ico?17113305112013-08-01T08:29:07ZRuby Issue Tracking SystemRuby master - Feature #8536: Implement is_numeric? family of methodshttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8536?journal_id=407782013-08-01T08:29:07Zphluid61 (Matthew Kerwin)matthew@kerwin.net.au
<ul></ul><p>=begin<br>
I am +1, if you change (({is_rationale?})) to (({is_rational?}))</p>
<p>Implementation question: is it reasonable to refactor rb_cstr_to_inum (etc.) to conditionally not perform the Integer object allocation?<br>
=end</p> Ruby master - Feature #8536: Implement is_numeric? family of methodshttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8536?journal_id=407832013-08-01T09:33:32Znobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)nobu@ruby-lang.org
<ul></ul><p>There is no "is_"+adjective+"?" built-in methods.<br>
And check-then-convert seems redundant.</p> Ruby master - Feature #8536: Implement is_numeric? family of methodshttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8536?journal_id=421382013-10-01T17:00:06Znaruse (Yui NARUSE)naruse@airemix.jp
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Assigned</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>2.1.0</i> to <i>2.6</i></li></ul> Ruby master - Feature #8536: Implement is_numeric? family of methodshttps://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8536?journal_id=689062017-12-25T18:15:12Znaruse (Yui NARUSE)naruse@airemix.jp
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>2.6</i></del>)</li></ul>