Project

General

Profile

Activity

From 11/28/2013 to 12/04/2013

12/04/2013

11:54 AM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
jballanc (Joshua Ballanco) wrote:
> To play devil's advocate, I think the opposing question to be asked is "how woul...
shugo (Shugo Maeda)

12/02/2013

01:23 AM Backport #8942 (Assigned): Wrong encoding for Windows native error messages
It's already fixed at trunk by a part of r41838. usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)
01:22 AM Backport #8943: Invalid encoding for Windows Registry
Oh, sorry, the previous message was wrong.
Please forget about it.
usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)
01:21 AM Backport #8943: Invalid encoding for Windows Registry
It's already fixed at trunk by a part of r41838. usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)

11/30/2013

07:07 PM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
To play devil's advocate, I think the opposing question to be asked is "how would you alter the behavior of case eval... jballanc (Joshua Ballanco)
10:48 AM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
Could anyone tell me use cases of this feature?
I think refinements are for object-oriented ways using dynamic dis...
shugo (Shugo Maeda)
05:12 PM Backport #9168 (Open): Segfault with Sync_m, Queue, and garbage collection
I think that this is serious.
i checked what happen at error case.
1. By break, throwobj is set to th->errinfo ...
tarui (Masaya Tarui)
11:54 AM Backport #9181: Please backport r43923
Please backport r43925, too. nagai (Hidetoshi Nagai)
01:12 AM Backport #9181 (Closed): Please backport r43923
Please backport r43923 to fix bugs on Ruby/Tk. nagai (Hidetoshi Nagai)

11/29/2013

11:09 PM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote:
> > a = *[1..10]
>
> You probably meant
>
> a = [*1..10]
Ah, I meant:
...
shugo (Shugo Maeda)
10:32 PM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote:
>
> a = *[1..10]
You probably meant
a = [*1..10]
Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
10:28 PM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
I've found that for expressions honor refinements.
module RefineEach
refine Array do
def each
yield...
shugo (Shugo Maeda)
09:07 PM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
> And very importantly, "===" called from case statement is controversial.
> It ca...
shugo (Shugo Maeda)
07:10 PM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
The basic principle of refinements is that refinement do work in local scope.
So methods called from the scope will ...
matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
06:38 PM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote:
> I strongly request committers not to change the behavior of Refinements without Matz's ...
sorah (Sorah Fukumori)
06:24 PM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
I strongly request committers not to change the behavior of Refinements without Matz's permission, except when there'... shugo (Shugo Maeda)
06:12 PM Backport #8872 (Assigned): Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
As I stated in #9150, I doubt this feature conforms to the design policy of refinements.
r42869 should be reverted, ...
shugo (Shugo Maeda)
05:58 PM Backport #8872: Case statements do not honor a refinement of the '===' method
@pixeltrix Fixed at r43913, Thank you for your reporting sorah (Sorah Fukumori)
05:59 PM Backport #9175 (Closed): Backport r43913
Please backport r43913.
- [ruby-core:58606]
- https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/13055
sorah (Sorah Fukumori)
02:06 PM Backport #9168 (Assigned): Segfault with Sync_m, Queue, and garbage collection
I wrote minimal code.
raise_proc = proc do
raise
end
10000.times do
ObjectSpace.define_finalizer(Object....
Glass_saga (Masaki Matsushita)
12:32 AM Backport #9169 (Closed): `require': cannot load such file -- date_core (LoadError) (ruby-2.0.0-p353)
This issue was solved with changeset r43904.
Yasuhiro, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby ...
nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga)

11/28/2013

09:34 PM Backport #9169: `require': cannot load such file -- date_core (LoadError) (ruby-2.0.0-p353)
Thank you for your report! It's a regression of 2.0.0-p353. I'll backport it soon. nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga)
04:01 PM Backport #9169 (Assigned): `require': cannot load such file -- date_core (LoadError) (ruby-2.0.0-p353)
nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
03:25 PM Backport #9169: `require': cannot load such file -- date_core (LoadError) (ruby-2.0.0-p353)
Wow, thank you for your quick response!
I hope this change backporting to branch ruby_2_0_0 of svn repo.
Can I help...
774 (Yasuhiro Nakayama)
01:56 PM Backport #9169 (Closed): `require': cannot load such file -- date_core (LoadError) (ruby-2.0.0-p353)
This issue was solved with changeset r43888.
Yasuhiro, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby ...
nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
11:43 AM Backport #9169 (Closed): `require': cannot load such file -- date_core (LoadError) (ruby-2.0.0-p353)
When building ruby-2.0.0-p353, the following message appeared.
Searching for files in directory /var/tmp/ruby-2....
774 (Yasuhiro Nakayama)
11:17 AM Backport #9168 (Closed): Segfault with Sync_m, Queue, and garbage collection
=begin
I am able to reliably generate a segmentation fault when using Sync_m & Queue together. The issue appears gar...
phemmer (Patrick Hemmer)
 

Also available in: Atom