Project

General

Profile

Activity

From 02/23/2014 to 03/01/2014

03/01/2014

12:01 PM Revision 45231: merge revision(s) 44432: [Backport #9299]
* proc.c: Having optional keyword arguments makes maximum arity +1,
not unlimited [#8072]
naruse (Yui NARUSE)
10:42 AM Backport #9575 (Feedback): Step with 0 step is buggy
r45209 conflicts with current ruby_2_1 branch.
Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
> Also, it might be good to modify the...
naruse (Yui NARUSE)
09:02 AM Backport #9576 (Closed): Backport r44370 to revert Hash#reject behavior
Applied in changeset r45227.
----------
merge revision(s) 44370: [Backport #9576]
hash.c: extra states
* hash.c ...
naruse (Yui NARUSE)
09:02 AM Revision 45227: merge revision(s) 44370: [Backport #9576]
hash.c: extra states
* hash.c (rb_hash_reject): use words "extra states".
naruse (Yui NARUSE)
08:46 AM Backport #9299: Required keyowrd arguments and arity
Thank you for comments.
Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
> Please excuse my ignorance, I'm not sure what a simple back...
naruse (Yui NARUSE)
08:25 AM Backport #9299 (Closed): Required keyowrd arguments and arity
Applied in changeset r45226.
----------
merge revision(s) 44433: [Backport #9299]
* proc.c: Having any mandatory k...
naruse (Yui NARUSE)
08:25 AM Revision 45226: merge revision(s) 44433: [Backport #9299]
* proc.c: Having any mandatory keyword argument increases min arity
[#9299]
naruse (Yui NARUSE)

02/28/2014

04:29 AM Backport #9576 (Closed): Backport r44370 to revert Hash#reject behavior
In [Bug #9223], naruse-san rejected incompatible change due to HashWithIndifferentAccess.
r44358 had changed const...
sorah (Sorah Fukumori)
03:01 AM Backport #9299: Required keyowrd arguments and arity
I consider this as a bug. So it should be back-ported to 2.1, I think.
Matz.
matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
02:15 AM Backport #9299: Required keyowrd arguments and arity
Please excuse my ignorance, I'm not sure what a simple backport is.
Dear Matz, hopefully you will know.
I alway...
marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)
02:25 AM Backport #9575: Step with 0 step is buggy
Also, it might be good to modify the 2.1 NEWS file to mention possibility of 0 step.
Thanks
marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)
02:11 AM Backport #9575: Step with 0 step is buggy
You'll have to backport r45206 -> r45208 in addition to r45209. marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)
02:07 AM Backport #9575: Step with 0 step is buggy
Found many other problems when some arguments are floats:
4.2.step(by: 0.0).first(2) # => [], should...
marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)

02/27/2014

05:25 PM Backport #9575 (Closed): Step with 0 step is buggy
I didn't realize that we now allow stepping with a '0' step. It should probably have been mentioned in the NEWS of 2.... marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)

02/24/2014

06:33 AM Revision 45163: bump version to 2.1.2
naruse (Yui NARUSE)
06:04 AM Revision 45162: merge revision(s) 44425,44460: [Backport #9320]
* tool/make-snapshot: support new version scheme.
* tool/make-snapshot: needs CXXFLAGS. [ruby-core:59393][Bug #9320]
naruse (Yui NARUSE)
04:24 AM Backport #9482 (Closed): backport r44809 and r44811
Applied in changeset r45160.
----------
merge revision(s) 44809,44811,44813,44815,44816,44817,44818,44918,45003: [Ba...
naruse (Yui NARUSE)
04:24 AM Revision 45160: merge revision(s) 44809,44811,44813,44815,44816,44817,44818,44918,45003: [Backport #9482]
* ext/psych/yaml/emitter.c: merge libyaml 0.1.5
* ext/psych/yaml/loader.c: ditto
* ext/psych/yaml/parser.c: ditto...
naruse (Yui NARUSE)
 

Also available in: Atom