Search
Results (5)
- Bug #21295 (Open): macos-13 debug build failures
- @Eregon [ruby/ruby-dev-builder](https://gi ... if one or more of the master builds fail.
- Bug #20158 (Assigned): Ractor affects Coverage results
- I have a large rspec test suite. I found that if I call a Ractor, the Coverage results are strongly affected, ... red. This happens even if I only ever call a Ractor before the library or rspec are required. ... lper.rb of other large suites: ```ruby # Ractor.new { nil } # uncomment this to affect cover ... is greatly reduced and unstable when calling Ractor above p Coverage.result.values.sum { |arr ... ub.com/simplecov-ruby/simplecov/issues/1058).
- Bug #19364 (Assigned): Issue with tracepoint enable/disable across ractors
- This sometimes segfaults: ```ruby def test_enable_disable_in_multiple_ractors_with_target rs = [] 100.times do |i| ... end end 100.times do |i| rs << Ractor.new(i) do |j| meth = :"my_method_to_change_for_tracing_#{j}" tp = TracePoint.new(:line) { } # local to ractor 100.times do tp.enable(targe ... raise end test_enable_disable_in_multiple_ractors_with_target() ``` Changing iseq internals is done without the VM lock. This is true in Tracepoint#enable and Tracepoint#disable methods. I have a patch coming.
- Bug #19112 (Assigned): Ractor garbage collection breaks/disables all active tracepoints
- Howdy 👋! I work for Datadog [on the `ddtrace` ... taDog/dd-trace-rb) and I found an issue with Ractors + TracePoint. ### Background For tracking time spent in Garbage Collection on our Ruby profiler, we use a tracepoint that listens to the internal GC events. While doing other experiments around Ractors and profiling, I noticed that our tracepoint would suddenly stop working after Ractors were used in the application. I was able to ... ``ruby puts RUBY_DESCRIPTION if ENV['RUN_RACTOR'] == 'true' Ractor.new { 10 }.take puts "Ractor ran!" else puts "Ractor DID NOT ran!" end puts "Enabling tracepoint" tracepoint = TracePoint...
- Feature #14394 (Assigned): Class.descendants
- There have been numerous implementations of t ... possible to add a `descendants` class method?