Shugo Maeda

  • Registered on: 05/08/2008
  • Last connection: 03/20/2015

Projects

Activity

Reported issues: 49

03/24/2015

08:47 AM Ruby trunk Revision 50072: * README.ja.md: should be chunibyo.

03/20/2015

06:18 AM Ruby trunk Bug #10850 (Rejected): BigDecimal division incorrect
Elyasin Shaladi wrote:
> Thanks for the answer Shugo,
>
> however I am not sure if that is easily possible for m...

03/05/2015

02:56 AM Ruby trunk Bug #10818 (Closed): Extrange behaviour when apliying a refinement inside eval
Applied in changeset r49851.
----------
* vm_eval.c (eval_string_with_cref): A binding should keep
refinements act...
02:56 AM Ruby trunk Bug #10818 (Closed): Extrange behaviour when apliying a refinement inside eval
Applied in changeset r49851.
----------
* vm_eval.c (eval_string_with_cref): A binding should keep
refinements act...
02:56 AM Ruby trunk Revision 49851: * vm_eval.c (eval_string_with_cref): A binding should keep
refinements activation information and the refinements should be
activated in subsequent eval calls with the bindin...
02:52 AM Ruby trunk Bug #10818: Extrange behaviour when apliying a refinement inside eval
Shugo Maeda wrote:
> I'd like to hear Matz's opinion.
I talked with Matz, and he said that a binding should keep ...
02:20 AM Ruby trunk Revision 49848: * test/ruby/test_refinement.rb: There is no need anymore to supress
warnings.

02/17/2015

05:40 AM Ruby trunk Bug #10856 (Closed): Splat with empty keyword args gives unexpected results
Sean Griffin wrote:
> When keyword args are passed to a method with splat, and there are no keyword args, an empty h...
03:05 AM Ruby trunk Bug #10850: BigDecimal division incorrect
Elyasin Shaladi wrote:
> I tried this in Ruby 2.1.4, 2.1.5 and 2.2.0, but in none of the versions it seems correct t...

02/10/2015

02:44 AM Ruby trunk Bug #10578: Allow undefining methods in refinements
I've committed the patch because I consider this issue a bug.
However, I'm not sure whether it should be backported.

Also available in: Atom