It was surprising to me that Enumerator, something mixed into Array, does not include `#empty?`. I think it is reasonable to assume people may have to guard iterating and other logic based on the emptiness of an enumerator, such was my c...f3ndot (Justin Bull)
I have chased this down to an opportunistic setting of 'Connection: close' header if-and-only-if #request is called when #started? is false. Attached is a patchfile where I remove this header setting, with the rationale laid out in the ...f3ndot (Justin Bull)
Hello, There appears to be a bug in Net::HTTP#request (and thus #get, #post, etc.) on an instance that isn't explicitly started by the programmer (by invoking #start first, or by executing #request inside a block passed to #start). ...f3ndot (Justin Bull)
Apologies, this looks like a bug in rdoc that was resolved late 2017: https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/pull/435 I've confirmed I can see `.alphanumeric` method in my own local rdoc (v6.0.1) output. Informed the maintainers of http://r...f3ndot (Justin Bull)
The `private def` keywords for methods above the `SecureRandom.alphanumeric` definition (method via #10849) appear to have caused rdoc generation to not output anything for the method. See http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-2.5.0/libdoc/secur...f3ndot (Justin Bull)
As an end user of Ruby, I'd like to be able to generate all sorts of cryptographically secure random characters. There's value in having only alphabetical or alphanumeric chars as they are slightly more human readable. My use case is ...f3ndot (Justin Bull)
f3ndot (Justin Bull)02:09 PM Ruby Feature #16833 (Assigned): Add Enumerable#empty?