Ruby Issue Tracking System

01/06/2010

10:57 AM Ruby Feature #1082: add Object#singleton_class method

=begin
Hi --

On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [ruby-core:27407] Re: [Feature #1082] add Object#singleton_class method"
> on Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:26:41 +0900, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang... dblack (David Black)

08/31/2009

07:40 AM Ruby Feature #2018: [irb] BasicObject.new doesn't have an inspect

=begin
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [ruby-core:25201] Re: [Bug #2018] [irb] BasicObject.new doesn't have an inspect"
> on Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:49:19 +0900, "David A. Black" <dblack@rub... dblack (David Black)

02:49 AM Ruby Feature #2018: [irb] BasicObject.new doesn't have an inspect

=begin
Hi --

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Daniel Bovensiepen wrote:

> Bug #2018: [irb] BasicObject.new doesn't have an inspect
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2018

Why is that a bug?


David

--
David A. Black / Ruby... dblack (David Black)

08/03/2009

03:01 AM Ruby Feature #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

=begin
Hi --

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Run Paint Run Run wrote:

> I wrote:
>>
>> I think that the exceptions and their messages can be useful in cases
>> like:
>>
>> (0.0..10.0).each {} # TypeError: can't iterate from float
>>
... dblack (David Black)

07/31/2009

10:10 AM Ruby Feature #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

=begin
Hi --

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Shyouhei Urabe wrote:

> Issue #1844 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
>
>
> Anyway when getting back to :dup story, I'm not against to make it
> more "reliable". But there seems to be sever... dblack (David Black)

10:03 AM Ruby Feature #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

=begin
Hi --

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Hongli Lai wrote:

> Issue #1844 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
>
>
> I disagree.
>
> - Exceptions are expensive.
> - Rescuing a specific exception requires a multi-line statement,
> while ... dblack (David Black)

02/11/2009

07:43 AM Ruby Feature #1122: request for: Object#try

=begin
Hi --

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Michal Babej wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 08 of February 2009 11:58:18 David A. Black wrote:
>> It's a bit punctuation-heavy but I think it's preferable. Of course
>> the whole thing leaves the ... dblack (David Black)

02/08/2009

08:01 PM Ruby Feature #1122: request for: Object#try

=begin
Hi --

On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Roger Pack wrote:

>>>> Anyone has better name?
>
> For me try's name is good but not perfect.
>
> There are a few more options described at [1]. if_not_nil is one.
> andand is one.
>
> I'd ... dblack (David Black)

07:59 PM Ruby Feature #1122: request for: Object#try

=begin
Hi--

On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

> Hi,
>
> 2009/2/7 David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com>:
>> Hi --
>>
>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2009/2/7 Narihiro Nakamura <redmine@ru... dblack (David Black)

02/07/2009

11:43 PM Ruby Feature #1122: request for: Object#try

=begin
Hi --

On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

> Hi,
>
> 2009/2/7 Narihiro Nakamura <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
>> Feature #1122: request for: Object#try
>> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1122
>>
>> Author: Nari... dblack (David Black)