General

Profile

psychoslave (mathieu lovato stumpf guntz)

  • Login: psychoslave
  • Registered on: 04/04/2019
  • Last sign in: 05/22/2023

Issues

open closed Total
Assigned issues 0 0 0
Reported issues 0 1 1

Activity

05/31/2020

04:00 PM Ruby Bug #16927 (Rejected): String#tr won't return the expected result for some sign with diacritics
# Context
Not much interest for the bug here, but I always appreciate to be given more context. So, as part of a larger project, I needed to utter every number from zero to 255 with a single syllable written as a consonant-vowel-conso...
psychoslave (mathieu lovato stumpf guntz)

04/05/2019

12:58 PM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters
Thank you Martin for your feedback.
I agree there is a degree of similarity between the thought disambiguation. Actually to some extent it even makes me consider using `@` prefix as a more coherent option.
In the same time, this *f...
psychoslave (mathieu lovato stumpf guntz)
10:18 AM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters
Hello Tsuyoshi Sawada:
> I hope you are not trying to repeat the joke in #15741 posted four days before.
I wasn't aware of this thread (thank you for the hint), and didn't try to make a joke with my own totally independent proposal.
psychoslave (mathieu lovato stumpf guntz)
08:41 AM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters
Hello Matthew! You wrote:
> The argument against the feature is people who don't want to use it, who inherit code (one way or another) from people who did use it and are therefore forced to use it. If you don't see it, it doesn't hur...
psychoslave (mathieu lovato stumpf guntz)

04/04/2019

09:35 AM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters
Thank you Jeremy for your detailed feedback.
> Not backwards compatible as `by` could already be a local variable or method.
One could just assume precedence of locally defined identifiers over keywords, but that is a whole othe...
psychoslave (mathieu lovato stumpf guntz)
06:09 AM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters
What about introducing a keyword that refer to an array rather than a direct access to each element? For example naming this hypothetical array accessor `by`:
``` ruby
h = Hash.new { by[0][by[1]] = "Go Fish: #{by[1]}" }
# Or to my m...
psychoslave (mathieu lovato stumpf guntz)

Also available in: Atom