psychoslave (mathieu lovato stumpf guntz)
- Login: psychoslave
- Registered on: 04/04/2019
- Last sign in: 05/22/2023
Issues
| open | closed | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reported issues | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Activity
05/31/2020
-
04:00 PM Ruby Bug #16927 (Rejected): String#tr won't return the expected result for some sign with diacritics
- # Context
Not much interest for the bug here, but I always appreciate to be given more context. So, as part of a larger project, I needed to utter every number from zero to 255 with a single syllable written as a consonant-vowel-conso...
04/05/2019
-
12:58 PM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters
- Thank you Martin for your feedback.
I agree there is a degree of similarity between the thought disambiguation. Actually to some extent it even makes me consider using `@` prefix as a more coherent option.
In the same time, this *f... -
10:18 AM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters
- Hello Tsuyoshi Sawada:
> I hope you are not trying to repeat the joke in #15741 posted four days before.
I wasn't aware of this thread (thank you for the hint), and didn't try to make a joke with my own totally independent proposal. -
08:41 AM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters
- Hello Matthew! You wrote:
> The argument against the feature is people who don't want to use it, who inherit code (one way or another) from people who did use it and are therefore forced to use it. If you don't see it, it doesn't hur...
04/04/2019
-
09:35 AM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters
- Thank you Jeremy for your detailed feedback.
> Not backwards compatible as `by` could already be a local variable or method.
One could just assume precedence of locally defined identifiers over keywords, but that is a whole othe... -
06:09 AM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters
- What about introducing a keyword that refer to an array rather than a direct access to each element? For example naming this hypothetical array accessor `by`:
``` ruby
h = Hash.new { by[0][by[1]] = "Go Fish: #{by[1]}" }
# Or to my m...