On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Ondrej Bilka <neleai@seznam.cz> wrote: > Hello. As returning from various blocks is recurring theme at list I propose following. > > You can assign label to each block. You can exit given block by ...yeban (Anurag Priyam)
Once this proposal has been implemented, would we also want to change the relevant API calls (in core, stdlib, etc.) to use keyword arguments instead of an optional Hash?yeban (Anurag Priyam)
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Jeremy Bopp <jeremy@bopp.net> wrote: > How about adding an attr_query method that otherwise works identically > to attr_reader but creates a method with a '?' on the end of the given > name instead? ...yeban (Anurag Priyam)
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Juan Wajnerman <jwajnerman@manas.com.ar> wrote: > > Issue #5364 has been updated by Juan Wajnerman. > > How about "object.:method" ? Looks more Ruby style for me.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@gmail.com> wrote: > > Issue #3131 has been updated by Suraj Kurapati. > > Any chance of this getting into Ruby 1.9.3? Â Thanks.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Martin Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: [...] > If anything is done in this direction, I'd prefer >  stryeban (Anurag Priyam)
> It would be nice if the ordered Hash in Ruby 1.9 was aliased as OrderedHash. > That way people who rely on preserving the insertion order in some application (me, for example) could explicitly use OrderedHash, and developers of Ruby ...yeban (Anurag Priyam)
> Hmm, how about this? > str.gsub(/\w.*?[.!?](?:\s+|\z)/){|c|c.capitalize}
This solves my problem better than what I was doing. Thanks. Do you think that other's could also benefit from such an extension to `capitalize`, or i...yeban (Anurag Priyam)
yeban (Anurag Priyam)12:23 AM Ruby Feature #5893: named return,next...