General

Profile

eike.rb (Eike Dierks)

  • Email: eike@inter.net
  • Registered on: 03/28/2012
  • Last connection: 04/05/2018

Issues

Activity

04/06/2018

02:24 AM Ruby trunk Feature #14666: nil.any?{} should return false
I fully aggree with all the commenters.
It boils down to if nil should be Enumerable.
Obviously it should be not....

04/05/2018

11:06 PM Ruby trunk Feature #14666 (Rejected): nil.any?{} should return false
Hi everyone at ruby/trunk
I encountered `nil.any?`
```
undefined method `any?' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError...

11/21/2017

02:19 AM Ruby trunk Bug #14122 (Open): Add LogicError
Dear friends at ruby
I'd like to suggest a new error for ruby-core: LogicError
That error should be thrown
upo...

11/17/2017

12:51 AM Ruby trunk Bug #14114 (Open): Add #step for Array, Enumerable, Enumerator
This must have been discussed before,
please reassigned and close this one.
I want to propose an extension to the...

03/19/2017

10:52 PM Ruby trunk Feature #13332 (Feedback): Forwardable#def_instance_delegator nil
I'd like to suggest an extension to the signature of stdlib Forwardable#def_instance_delegator
currently (ruby 2.3...

02/23/2017

03:22 AM Ruby trunk Feature #13244 (Rejected): stdlib/Logger: add option: level
I'd like to suggest
to enhance the interface of stdlib/logger
The #new method should allow for an option to set t...

08/17/2016

07:06 PM Ruby trunk Bug #12685 (Feedback): malloc error: pointer being freed was not allocated
ruby crashed
- never seen that before
- should never happen
- looks serious to me
I'm using ruby 2.3.1p112 (20...

07/24/2016

11:36 PM Ruby trunk Feature #12625 (Open): TypeError.assert, ArgumentError.assert
I am well aware that ruby is not typed (and so for a good reason)
But sometimes it makes sense to check the types ...
10:02 PM Ruby trunk Feature #12624 (Rejected): !== (other)
I'd like to suggest a new syntactic feature.
There should be an operator `!==`
which should just return the negat...

06/15/2016

08:19 PM Ruby trunk Feature #12482: ArgumentError.new(nil) should give a better description
OK, that change would break the spec.
I do understand that breaking the spec something that we rarely want to do.
...

Also available in: Atom