Milella@Hotmail.com (Scott Milella)
- Login: Milella@Hotmail.com
- Registered on: 01/19/2023
- Last sign in: 01/31/2023
Issues
| open | closed | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reported issues | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Activity
01/31/2023
-
08:26 PM Ruby Misc #19352: Feature #17391 was not such a good idea because now Ruby 3.2 can not install Rails v5 or v6 if they use webpacker.
- > I just released `webpacker 5.4.4`, you can just upgrade now.
THANK YOU @Byroot
I was able to do a rails _6.1.7_ new testapp and it installed WITH webpacker and finished without issue.
Thank You VERY MUCH!
This is all I wa... -
07:58 PM Ruby Misc #19352: Feature #17391 was not such a good idea because now Ruby 3.2 can not install Rails v5 or v6 if they use webpacker.
- sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada) wrote in #note-15:
> Milella@Hotmail.com (Scott Milella) wrote in #note-13:
> ...
That was not what I meant; my meaning was that if those RUBY methods were deprecated over 12 years ago and EVERYONE should have kn... -
04:51 PM Ruby Misc #19352: Feature #17391 was not such a good idea because now Ruby 3.2 can not install Rails v5 or v6 if they use webpacker.
- byroot (Jean Boussier) wrote in #note-12:
> I just released `webpacker 5.4.4`, you can just upgrade now.
Thank you for that! I will give that a try in a short while, appreciate that! :)
> ...
That was just one part (the last ... -
04:17 PM Ruby Misc #19352: Feature #17391 was not such a good idea because now Ruby 3.2 can not install Rails v5 or v6 if they use webpacker.
- I think in the long run for Ruby and Rails leaving those 2 methods in place or putting an alias into the code would be a benefit to the community.
I also don't think I would call Rails 6.1.7 "very old code". There are thousands maybe ...
01/19/2023
-
05:37 PM Ruby Misc #19352: Feature #17391 was not such a good idea because now Ruby 3.2 can not install Rails v5 or v6 if they use webpacker.
- > That said, this is easily monkey patched:
> ...
@Austin, That is AWESOME! Thank you for that!
Where would be the best place for that code go? In application.rb? or as an initializer or? What would you recommend?
I am asking m... -
12:57 AM Ruby Misc #19352 (Closed): Feature #17391 was not such a good idea because now Ruby 3.2 can not install Rails v5 or v6 if they use webpacker.
- Hello,
I tried logging a GitHub issue to Rails to make them aware of this issue but they said they are no longer bugfixing Rails v6.1 anymore.
So since this IS a Ruby issue at its core this might be the best place for this.
You re...