AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)
- Login: AlexandreMagro
- Email: alexandremagro@live.com
- Registered on: 09/29/2024
- Last sign in: 12/19/2024
Issues
open | closed | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reported issues | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Like
Activity
11/29/2024
- 11:53 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
- austin (Austin Ziegler) wrote in #note-53:
> AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro) wrote in #note-52:
> > austin (Austin... - 06:19 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
- austin (Austin Ziegler) wrote in #note-50:
> As I said, I don't think Ruby needs a pipe operator, but I wonder if a ... - 05:55 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
- lpogic (Łukasz Pomietło) wrote in #note-49:
> I wanted _str_, _a_simple_json_ and _a_ to be treated as variables, ma...
11/12/2024
- 07:02 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
- lpogic (Łukasz Pomietło) wrote in #note-46:
> I wonder if the pipeline operator with assignment wouldn't also be use...
11/09/2024
- 09:42 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
- austin (Austin Ziegler) wrote in #note-40:
> Ruby already *has* pipeline-like method, `#then`. If `|>` or `.{}` act... - 09:23 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
- lpogic (Łukasz Pomietło) wrote in #note-43:
> baweaver (Brandon Weaver) wrote in #note-41:
> > Frequently what folk...
11/08/2024
- 08:28 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
- @lpogic In these cases, you wouldn’t use pipes:
```ruby
def foo
q_result = q(r) # because q_result is importan...
11/06/2024
- 09:12 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
- mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20781#note-9 at DevMeeting:
> AlexandreMagro (Alexand...
11/03/2024
- 09:21 PM Ruby master Misc #20781: DevMeeting-2024-11-07
- * [Feature #20770] (Re)Introduce pipe operator (AlexandreMagro)
* Initially proposed as syntactic sugar for `.then`...
10/15/2024
- 10:01 AM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
- Reflecting on the opposing points raised, I believe the pipe operator could work differently, avoiding the issue of "...
Also available in: Atom