General

Profile

AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)

Issues

open closed Total
Assigned issues 0 0 0
Reported issues 1 0 1

Like

Activity

10/02/2024

04:14 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
zverok (Victor Shepelev) wrote in #note-28:
> What would `|>` bring here?
> ```ruby
> row
> .split('|')
> .map { ...
AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)

10/01/2024

10:46 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
I strongly agree that new additions should be thoroughly evaluated and aligned with the philosophy of the language ("... AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)
05:47 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
ufuk (Ufuk Kayserilioglu) wrote in #note-21:
> I tend to agree with @Dan0042 on this one, this seems to go against t...
AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)
01:08 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
vo.x (Vit Ondruch) wrote in #note-18:
> Right, this was far fetched and would not work admittedly. But that is why I...
AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)

09/30/2024

11:58 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote in #note-10:
> We could expand the syntax to treat `.{}` as `.then{}`, similar to ...
AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)
10:30 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
ufuk (Ufuk Kayserilioglu) wrote in #note-8:
> You can also make the whole pipeline with just using procs:
> ```rub...
AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)
09:23 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
vo.x (Vit Ondruch) wrote in #note-6:
> Code like `add(value, 3)` is hardly some idiomatic Ruby. If it was Ruby, then...
AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)
07:02 PM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
bkuhlmann (Brooke Kuhlmann) wrote in #note-4:
> For background, this has been discussed before:
>
> - [15799](htt...
AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)
02:24 AM Ruby master Feature #20770: A *new* pipe operator proposal
nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) wrote in #note-1:
> In the previous trial syntax, the receiver of RHS was the result of LHS....
AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)

09/29/2024

05:57 PM Ruby master Feature #20770 (Open): A *new* pipe operator proposal
Hello,
This is my first contribution here. I have seen previous discussions around introducing a pipe operator, bu...
AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro)

Also available in: Atom