nuzair46 (Nuzair Rasheed)
- Login: nuzair46
- Registered on: 07/24/2025
- Last sign in: 03/17/2026
Issues
| open | closed | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reported issues | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Activity
03/17/2026
-
02:50 PM Ruby Feature #21520 (Closed): Feature Proposal: Enumerator::Lazy#tee
- Applied in changeset commit:git|3903419deeece358c31b3da9afc4a0250139a5e4.
----------
[Feature #21520] Rename Enumerator::Lazy#tee to #tap_each -
- Thanks for the comment. Since the PR was already merged recently, I will make a new PR to address the name change from `tee` to `tap_each`.
-
02/17/2026
-
- Just checking in on this feature. Is there anything missing from the current implementation that would help move it forward?
08/21/2025
-
- matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote in #note-11:
> I don't think `lazy_each` is a good name. We just wanted to peek the element in the stream, being lazy or not. In that sense, `tee` is better, if you are familiar with UNIX (like me).
> ..... -
- nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) wrote in #note-9:
> A couple days ago, another name came to me: `tee`.
Thanks, `tee` is a great fit. It’s short and feels very Unix-y. I will make changes to the PR and the proposal soon.
08/05/2025
-
- The PR is open for review https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/14024
07/30/2025
-
- updated to `lazy_each`
07/28/2025
-
- nuzair46 (Nuzair Rasheed) wrote in #note-3:
> Enumerator#peek [works differently](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/ja/latest/method/Enumerator/i/peek.html) than this suggestion.
> ...
Running the whole CI, I see the collision with Enumerato...
07/25/2025
-
- Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) wrote in #note-2:
> #peek already exists, and does something different.
Hey, Enumerator#peek exists. but Enumerator::Lazy#peek does not.
Enumerator#peek [works differently](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/ja/late...