Dirkjan Bussink

  • Email:
  • Registered on: 05/19/2009
  • Last connection: 04/09/2014

Projects

Activity

Reported issues: 3

01/24/2014

07:55 PM ruby-trunk Bug #9424: ruby 1.9 & 2.x has insecure SSL/TLS client defaults
First of all thanks to Martin for working on the white list. I still believe specifying defaults here is the best of ...

01/22/2014

10:59 AM ruby-trunk Bug #9424: ruby 1.9 & 2.x has insecure SSL/TLS client defaults
Yusuke Endoh wrote:
> Please give us not only words but also a concrete plan.
As said in the original mailing...

06/10/2013

07:14 PM ruby-trunk Bug #8399: Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed
Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote:
> Could you share that benchmark?
> I could notice the difference in an highly cons...

06/08/2013

06:47 PM ruby-trunk Bug #8399: Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed
I've attached an updated version of the patch that uses rb_ary_subseq instead of manually creating an array. That mea...
05:57 PM ruby-trunk Bug #8399: Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed
Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote:
> I guess it is mostly fine, but what about the for loop instead of rb_ary_new4() (whi...
01:52 AM ruby-trunk Bug #8399: Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed
Besides the discussion about the exact approach for the future, is it possible to merge in the originally proposed pa...

05/15/2013

09:17 PM ruby-trunk Bug #8399: Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed
ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote:
> (2013/05/15 14:38), dbussink (Dirkjan Bussink) wrote:
> > If we're changing something...
09:14 PM ruby-trunk Bug #8399: Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed
Hanmac (Hans Mackowiak) wrote:
> hm i dont know if i like that, i use RARRAY_PTR for fast array access (like when i ...
02:38 PM ruby-trunk Bug #8399: Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed
normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote:
> Perhaps RARRAY_PTR_RO can be introduced to declare read-only access on
> non-...

05/13/2013

08:14 PM ruby-trunk Bug #8399: Remove usage of RARRAY_PTR in C extensions when not needed
ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote:
> Let us clarify your statement (sorry if I missed in your messages).
>
> (1) Do ...

Also available in: Atom