General

Profile

The8472 (Aaron G)

Issues

open closed Total
Assigned issues 0 0 0
Reported issues 0 0 0

Activity

12/08/2012

05:29 AM Ruby Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
On 07.12.2012 21:02, rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas) wrote:
>
> Issue #4085 has been updated by rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas).
>
>
> Aaron, I see your point but often my queries are much more complex than a single me...
The8472 (Aaron G)
04:53 AM Ruby Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
On 07.12.2012 16:23, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> Not all column names can be represented as method names. Or can they?

Most columns should be possible, considering that even unicode method
names are valid.

For those ...
The8472 (Aaron G)

12/07/2012

10:23 AM Ruby Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
On 06.12.2012 17:01, rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas) wrote:
> The problem is that currently you can't use both Sequel and Squeel gems because both override the same symbol methods.

That's not necessarily true. Squeel supports...
The8472 (Aaron G)

12/02/2012

12:53 AM Ruby Feature #7487: Cutting through the issues with Refinements
On 01.12.2012 16:40, trans (Thomas Sawyer) wrote:
>
> Issue #7487 has been updated by trans (Thomas Sawyer).
>
>
> I didn't understand such response at first. Now, I think I realize possible confusion. I am proposing that cuts...
The8472 (Aaron G)

12/01/2012

09:23 PM Ruby Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
On 30.11.2012 20:41, headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
> respond_to? brings up a really good point: there's lots of methods that might need special refinement care...but I think it makes things more confusing rather than less.
>
> L...
The8472 (Aaron G)
03:59 AM Ruby Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
> Since there still remain undefined corner case behavior in refinements, and the time is running out, I decided not to introduce full refinement for Ruby 2.0. The limited Ruby 2.0 refinement spec will be:
>
> * refinements are file...
The8472 (Aaron G)

11/23/2012

05:59 AM Ruby Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
On 22.11.2012 17:40, headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:

> After lookup, call sites would know there's potentially refinements active for the given method. The calling scope (or parent scopes) would have references to individual refine...
The8472 (Aaron G)

11/22/2012

08:23 AM Ruby Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
On 21.11.2012 07:15, shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote:
> I'll remove it if permission granted by Matz.
>
>> For now people can use Module.extended/.included if they really want to
>> add refinement inheritance themselves.
>
> C...
The8472 (Aaron G)

11/21/2012

08:23 AM Ruby Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
On 20.11.2012 03:45, shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote:
> I think optional features of Refinements are as follows:
>
> A. refinement inheritance in class hierarchies

I generally think that class/module inheritance is the wrong propag...
The8472 (Aaron G)

11/17/2012

12:53 PM Ruby Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
> So, in one sense, refinements are to localize monkey-patching. But they don't actually localize it much better since they can apply at a distance to blocks (module_eval feature), and classes down-hierarchy.
> Previously, all code de...
The8472 (Aaron G)

Also available in: Atom