On Dec 4, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi, > > I am neutral about local rebinding. It is useful sometimes (as > someone has pointed out in this thread). At the same time, I agree > with you that perfo...raggi (James Tucker)
> Issue #3726 has been updated by Yura Sokolov. > > >> It is also worth noting that this is actually measuring the load time for rubygems itself. > > I understood it. > ...raggi (James Tucker)
=begin This isn't degradation, it's actually correct behaviour. RubyGems can be (and will be) optimised over time, but the old performance was reliant on very incorrect semantics that are not acceptable for production use. =end raggi (James Tucker)
On 24 Jul 2010, at 01:52, Heesob Park wrote: > I think that the sample code should be modified like this. > > t1.rb > ==================================================== > a = Thread.new { puts "a"; Thread.stop; puts "c"...raggi (James Tucker)
> Bug #3606: Thread.stop and puts fail to work as documented. > http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3606 > > Author: Heesob Park > Status: Open, Priority: Normal > Cate...raggi (James Tucker)