kivikakk (Asherah Connor)
- Login: kivikakk
- Registered on: 01/24/2014
- Last sign in: 10/27/2024
Issues
| open | closed | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reported issues | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Activity
07/19/2018
-
06:29 AM Ruby Feature #5446: at_fork callback API
- Are we still interested in pursuing something like this? I'd be happy to push it forward.
06/25/2018
-
05:47 AM Ruby Bug #14834: rb_profile_frames SEGV when PC adjusted on IFUNC
- Here's an easy way to reproduce the segfault on current trunk:
`Gemfile`
~~~ ruby
source "https://rubygems.org"
gem "stackprof"
~~~
`test.rb`
~~~ ruby
require 'stackprof'
StackProf.run(mode: :object) do
[123].grou...
06/08/2018
-
05:44 AM Ruby Bug #14834: rb_profile_frames SEGV when PC adjusted on IFUNC
- Further:
* is the original change correct? Some instructions have the `handle_frame?` property, which means they *do* increment the PC by the instruction width first. It's those that don't have that property which now increment the PC... -
05:13 AM Ruby Bug #14834: rb_profile_frames SEGV when PC adjusted on IFUNC
- It's also worth noting:
* is the increment of `pc` with `ec->cfp->pc++` correct? What if the instruction is multiple values wide?
* there are similar `pc` increment/decrement pairs around `EXEC_EVENT_HOOK` calls in `vm_trace`. Do we ... -
05:07 AM Ruby Bug #14834 (Closed): rb_profile_frames SEGV when PC adjusted on IFUNC
- Since r62052, we increment `ec->cfp->pc` by one pointer width (e.g. 8 bytes) in `gc_event_hook_body` around the `EXEC_EVENT_HOOK` call.
This becomes a problem when the hook is on an IFUNC: in this case, `pc == 0x0`, meaning we increme...
03/08/2018
-
01:55 AM Ruby Bug #14586 (Closed): URI::RFC2396_Parser#unescape raises an exception if the input is mixed Unicode and percent-escapes
- Currently, the following test case passes:
~~~ ruby
def test_unescape
p1 = URI::Parser.new
assert_equal("\xe3\x83\x90", p1.unescape("\xe3\x83\x90"))
assert_equal("\xe3\x83\x90", p1.unescape('%e3%83%90'))
end
~~~
But the...
01/25/2016
-
01:22 AM Ruby Misc #12004: Code of Conduct
- The new guidelines look good. I support Shyouhei's suggestion to leave the final decision up to Matz.
01/24/2014
-
03:25 AM Ruby Bug #9424: ruby 1.9 & 2.x has insecure SSL/TLS client defaults
- Shyouhei Urabe wrote:
> I don't wanna be raped like them.
How on earth can you think this is appropriate?