General

Profile

knu (Akinori MUSHA)

  • Login: knu
  • Email: knu@ruby-lang.org
  • Registered on: 04/28/2008
  • Last connection: 06/14/2021

Issues

open closed Total
Assigned issues 14 130 144
Reported issues 0 27 27

Projects

Project Roles Registered on
Ruby Developer 07/18/2008
Backport187 Developer, Release Manager 06/03/2008
Backport191 Developer 05/16/2009
Backport192 Developer 10/05/2011
Backport193 Developer 08/24/2011
Backport200 Developer 02/17/2013
Backport21 Developer 12/21/2013
Backport22 Developer 12/19/2014
CommonRuby Developer 12/21/2012
Ruby 1.8 Developer, Release Manager 04/28/2008
Ruby master Developer 04/28/2008

Activity

05/21/2021

10:12 AM Ruby master Feature #17873: Update of default gems in Ruby 3.1
I don't see a good reason to remove the syslog library from ruby.
It is so small, simple, and almost maintenance-fre...
knu (Akinori MUSHA)

04/16/2021

07:03 AM Ruby master Feature #15198: Array#intersect?
We discussed this in today's developer meeting. Here are some remarks:
- It takes one argument for now.
- It means ...
knu (Akinori MUSHA)

03/15/2021

05:25 AM Ruby master Bug #16996: Hash should avoid doing unnecessary rehash
I think I can just drop the spec in test_set.rb, if it is blocking this. knu (Akinori MUSHA)

01/13/2021

01:48 AM Ruby master Feature #16989: Sets: need ♥️
knu (Akinori MUSHA) wrote in #note-29:
> For example, a program that goes `hash = {}; hash << 1; hash[:key] = :value...
knu (Akinori MUSHA)
01:26 AM Ruby master Feature #16989: Sets: need ♥️
I don't like the idea of making `array & hash` possible, as that would go against the trends of making Ruby type-frie... knu (Akinori MUSHA)

01/12/2021

04:57 AM Ruby master Feature #16989: Sets: need ♥️
akr (Akira Tanaka) wrote in #note-22:
> I like extending Hash instead of incorporating Set.
> For example, #inspect...
knu (Akinori MUSHA)

11/18/2020

01:48 PM Ruby master Feature #17333: Enumerable#many?
ITYM `> 1`. 😉 knu (Akinori MUSHA)

09/04/2020

01:13 AM Ruby master Feature #16990: Sets: operators compatibility with Array
mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote in #note-9:
> I expect that `ary + set` return a Set, not an Array, unless it raises an ex...
knu (Akinori MUSHA)

09/03/2020

08:50 AM Ruby master Feature #16990: Sets: operators compatibility with Array
As for the result type, I think Array operators should return arrays. Otherwise `array += set` would turn the variab... knu (Akinori MUSHA)
08:47 AM Ruby master Feature #16990: Sets: operators compatibility with Array
We can probably define Set#to_ary if it's OK, and Array#+ will be able to deal with a set. Let us think about the do... knu (Akinori MUSHA)

Also available in: Atom