I think this can be closed because: 1. JSON/YAML file can be created on ruby-lang.org and cached on other sites if necessary (I'll propose a format on https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org) 2. Tools like rbenv, RVM, RubyGems and ...Cezary (Cezary Baginski)
Would it make sense for ruby-lang.org to provide an "API" for announcing which versions are supported and until when? If such warnings were to be implemented in RubyGems, it be useful to have info about supported/unsupported Ruby vers...Cezary (Cezary Baginski)
Tsuyoshi Sawada wrote: > Perhaps this can be requested as a feature of ruby gems. (...) It makes sense because you need to be connected to the internet to get the latest information, and perhaps `gem update` is the only thing you do con...Cezary (Cezary Baginski)
Yui NARUSE wrote: > I doubt such people who work extremely hard have a time to such warnings because there shall be already so many warnings. I agree. If it is added only as a Ruby warning, people won't see it by default. If they ena...Cezary (Cezary Baginski)
**TL;DR - I'm listing real-life situations such warnings would address. Mostly about how people behave and what they expect. Just to demonstrate how important and useful such warnings could be.** Jeremy Evans wrote: > I am agains...Cezary (Cezary Baginski)
Eric Wong wrote: > I don't want a nanny scripting language. Thank you, Eric. I don't either. I agree expiry is a bad idea. Especially if the Ruby-core team ever decides to change dates. You helped me realize some people are fully...Cezary (Cezary Baginski)
Migrating from Ruby 1.9.3 to Ruby 2.2 is trivial. But, people still remember that moving from Ruby 1.8.7 to 1.9.3 was difficult and risky. Ruby is used for so many important projects nowadays. People should be educated to upgrade Ru...Cezary (Cezary Baginski)
## Problem Users are often still using unsupported Ruby versions and developers and unknowingly supporting them. ## Impact Developers and maintainers are often "forced" to work extremely hard and support outdated Rubies in fear ...Cezary (Cezary Baginski)
Not sure if it's related, but I'm getting segfaults instead of SystemStackErrors with recursive lambda calls from: example_spec.rb: `describe Fixnum do subject { subject } it { should be } end` by running: `rspec exam...Cezary (Cezary Baginski)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:23:27PM +0900, Rocky Bernstein wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Cezary <cezary.baginski@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So why not just use the following in such programs: > > > > ~~~ruby > > def ...Cezary (Cezary Baginski)
Cezary (Cezary Baginski)01:10 AM Ruby Feature #12328: Show warnings about vulnerable and no longer supported Ruby versions.