Helder Pereira wrote: > Leo Correa, I think your patch will fail for this example: > ... I made a test case for that and passed with [2, 4, 6, 7] tonkpils (Leo Correa)
I have made a patch that seems to fix the issue for these cases. I'm not entirely sure why there was a multiplier for data.bufmax in the first place but it seemed to be the cause. tonkpils (Leo Correa)
tonkpils (Leo Correa)10:07 PM Ruby Bug #11471: min, min_by, max, max_by with optional parameter return a wrong value