Actions
Bug #12430
closedSegfault in irb when improperly using coerce in combination with method_missing
Description
Don't ask how or why I wrote this code, but suppose you have a class like this:
class BrokenNumber
def initialize(num)
@num = num
end
def method_missing(m, *a, &b)
@num.send(m, *a, &b)
end
def coerce(other)
[self, self]
end
end
Then you require this code in IRB, and you create a new instance (x) and you then call 2+x.
The first call will raise a SystemStackError. The second will cause a segmentation fault.
>> require "./broken"
=> true
>> x = BrokenNumber.new(2)
=> #<BrokenNumber:0x007f8b5a84c190 @num=2>
>> 2 + x
SystemStackError: stack level too deep
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
... 7559 levels...
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `+'
from /Users/gtb/broken.rb:7:in `method_missing'
from (irb):3:in `+'
from (irb):3
from /Users/gtb/.rubies/ruby-2.3.1/bin/irb:11:in `<main>'
>> 2 + x
Segmentation fault: 11
MacBook-Pro:~ gtb$ ruby -v
ruby 2.3.1p112 (2016-04-26 revision 54768) [x86_64-darwin15]
I've asked multiple people to confirm this and they've reproduced the error. I have no clue how to debug it, but thought it may be worth mentioning... even though it's a strange corner case and invalid code.
Updated by sandal (Gregory Brown) over 8 years ago
- ruby -v set to ruby 2.3.1p112
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
I don't think this is a bug, the SystemStackError is expected. In some cases, Ruby doesn't catch the stack overflow and you end up with a segfault.
The reason for the behavior:
x = BrokenNumber.new(2)
# original expression
2 + x
# Integer#+ calls (via rb_num_coerce_bin->do_coerce):
x.coerce(2)
# x.coerce(2) returns:
[x, x]
# Integer#+ calls (via rb_num_coerce_bin):
x + x
# BrokenNumber#+ not defined, so calls:
x.method_missing(:+, x)
# BrokenNumber#method_missing calls:
2 + x # the original expression, so a loop
Actions
Like0
Like0Like0