autoload provides the ability to load libraries on the fly, also called lazy loading, in order to avoid huge startup times.
This has some disadvantages, who already lead nearly to its discontinuation
I suggest a proposal, that solves both these issues.
I imagine this keyword, respectively method behaves like
require at the top of the file and does act like
autoload within a definition.
We can also introduce exceptions for cases like the above linked threads.
Its also a nice guideline, and easy to remember.
introduce can always behave predictable, optimal, and even work fine without the programmer knowing about its implementation.
Updated by shalokshalom (Matthias Schuster) about 2 months ago
I see value in it, since it gives us one unified way, to call libraries:
Where ever you do it, when ever you do it, it is always the most optimal choice.
Currently, users shy away from using autoload, since its riddled with use cases, in which it can bite your back.
introduce always uses the most optimal way.
This gives a nice 'wrapper' around autoload and require, that lets us use always the most optimal of the two.
It can encourage, to load libraries only, when they are really used, and by that, increasing the start-up performance.
I hope this can help :)