Project

General

Profile

Bug #19473

Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) about 1 year ago

Simple reproducer: 
 ``` 
 $ ruby -ve 'm=Mutex.new; trap(:HUP) { m.synchronize { p :OK } }; Process.kill :HUP, Process.pid; sleep 0.1' 
 ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-08 revision 31819e82c8) [x86_64-linux] 
 -e:1:in `synchronize': can't be called from trap context (ThreadError) 
	 from -e:1:in `block in <main>' 
	 from -e:1:in `kill' 
	 from -e:1:in `<main>' 
 ``` 

 Expected behavior: 
 ``` 
 $ ruby -ve 'm=Mutex.new; trap(:HUP) { m.synchronize { p :OK } }; Process.kill :HUP, Process.pid; sleep 0.1' 
 truffleruby 22.3.1, like ruby 3.0.3, GraalVM CE Native [x86_64-linux] 
 :OK 

 $ ruby -ve 'm=Mutex.new; trap(:HUP) { m.synchronize { p :OK } }; Process.kill :HUP, Process.pid; sleep 0.1' 
 jruby 9.4.0.0 (3.1.0) 2022-11-23 95c0ec159f OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 17.0.6+10 on 17.0.6+10 +jit [x86_64-linux] 
 :OK 
 ``` 

 This exception is highly problematic, for instance it breaks `Timeout.timeout` in `trap`: 
 https://github.com/ruby/timeout/issues/17#issuecomment-1142035939 

 I suppose this behavior is because *sometimes* it's problematic to lock a Mutex in trap, e.g., if it's already locked by the main thread/fiber. 
 But that would otherwise already raise `deadlock; recursive locking (ThreadError)`, so there is no point to fail early. 
 And However, that's just one case, not all, so we should not always raise an exception. exception early like that. 

 There seems to be no valid reason to prevent *all* `Mutex#synchronize` in `trap`. 
 After all, if the Mutex for instance is only used in `trap`, it's well-defined AFAIK. 
 For instance a given trap handler does not seem executed concurrently: 
 ``` 
 $ ruby -ve 'trap(:HUP) { puts "in trap\n"+caller.join("\n")+"\n\n"; sleep 0.1 }; pid = Process.pid; Process.wait fork { 20.times { Process.kill :HUP, pid } }; sleep 1' 
 ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-08 revision 31819e82c8) [x86_64-linux] 
 in trap 
 -e:1:in `wait' 
 -e:1:in `<main>' 

 in trap 
 -e:1:in `wait' 
 -e:1:in `<main>' 

 in trap 
 -e:1:in `wait' 
 -e:1:in `<main>' 

 in trap 
 -e:1:in `wait' 
 -e:1:in `<main>' 

 in trap 
 -e:1:in `wait' 
 -e:1:in `<main>' 

 in trap 
 -e:1:in `wait' 
 -e:1:in `<main>' 

 ``` 

 And if the trap handler using the Mutex is never called while the Mutex is held by the main thread/fiber, there is also no problem.

Back