Feature #2172
Updated by akr (Akira Tanaka) over 11 years ago
=begin What should "(1..3).chunk" (i.e. without a block) do? It issued an ArgumentError: tried to create Proc object without a block I changed the error message to "no block given" which I hope to be more informative, but maybe there is something more useful to do here? A default block of {|x| x} doesn't seem all that useful. Returning an enumerator that, upon completion, will return an enumerator would probably be better, but could also be a bit confusing if someone doesn't realize he forgot to specify the block? Thanks to Run Paint for raising the question when writing the rubyspec for #chunk. =end