Feature #12624
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) over 8 years ago
I'd like to suggest a new syntactic feature. There should be an operator `!==` !== which should just return the negation of the `===` === operator ### aka: ```ruby def !==(other) ! (self === other) end ``` ### Rationale: The `===` === operator is well established. The `!==` !== operator would just return the negated truth value of `===` === That syntax would mimick the duality of `==` == vs `!=` != ### Impact: To my best knowledge, `!==` !== is currently rejected by the parser, so there should be no exsiting code be affected by this change. ### Do we really need that? obviously `(! (! (a === b))` b)) does the job, while, `(a (a !== b)` b) looks a bit more terse to me. ### What's the use case? I personally got a habit of using `===` === in type checking arguments: ```ruby raise TypeError() unless (SomeClass === arg) ``` You might argue that I should write instead: ```ruby raise TypeError() unless arg.kind_of?(SomeClass) ``` (you are obviously right in that) But the `===` === operator is there for a reason, and it is actually a strong point of ruby, that we do not only have identity or equivalence, but this third kind of object defined equality. I believe, that in some cases the intention of a boolean clause would be easier to understand if we had that `!==` !== operator instead of writing `!(a===b)` !(a===b) I agree, syntax ahould not change. But I believe that would add to the orthogonality. --- Please see also: my request on reserving the UTF operator plane for operators