Ruby Issue Tracking System

01/27/2018

01:02 AM Ruby Feature #13618: [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid

Hi Eric,

It is really a shame that your replies in this thread are not being
added to the issue tracker.
Samuel's reply is there but your reply once again didn't get in.

Please try to do something about it because the conversati... subtileos (Daniel Ferreira)

12:58 AM Ruby Feature #13618: [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:

> These two?

Yes Eric. And the last one as well. And I guess this here that I will
send will happen the same.
I believe it will be better to not reply to way while this is broken.
Which ... subtileos (Daniel Ferreira)

12:57 AM Ruby Feature #13618: [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid

Hi Eric,

I've been reading this issue and I'm finding it fascinating.
Let me play here the role of the ruby developer that is seeking to
understand better the asynchronous ruby capabilities.
Every time I read threads(conversations... subtileos (Daniel Ferreira)

03/30/2017

04:41 AM Ruby Feature #12589: VM performance improvement proposal

Hi Matthew,

> https://developer.ibm.com/open/2017/03/01/ruby-omr-jit-compiler-whats-next/

I was reading your article, and I would like to say that what you
present there is just fantastic in my point of view.
Why fantastic? Beca... subtileos (Daniel Ferreira)

03/29/2017

04:32 AM Ruby Feature #12589: VM performance improvement proposal

Hi Vladimir,


On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:26 AM, <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote:

> You can find the code on
> https://github.com/vnmakarov/ruby/tree/rtl_mjit_branch. Please, read
> file README.md about the project first.
>

T... subtileos (Daniel Ferreira)

04:12 AM Ruby Feature #12589: VM performance improvement proposal

> I think I've reached a state of the project to make its current
> code public. Most of the infrastructure for RTL insns and JIT has
> been implemented.

Hi Vladimir,

Thank you very much for this post.
That README is pricele... subtileos (Daniel Ferreira)

02/22/2017

06:53 PM Ruby Feature #13026: Public singleton methods

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Interesting. Could you tell us expected use-case?
> ...
Hi Matz. Thank you for your question and the opportunity.
Unit tests are one of the ways I use to enforce the class/module API contract.
So for a... subtileos (Daniel Ferreira)

02/19/2017

11:41 PM Ruby Feature #13221: [PATCH] gems/bundled_gems: add "curses" RubyGem

> I'm concerned about the increasing tendency to unbundle core functionality (`curses`, `tcl/tk`, ...; and possibly soon also `date`).

I also share this concern.

This is one discussion I've been keen to start with the creation of
... subtileos (Daniel Ferreira)

02/16/2017

02:33 AM Ruby Feature #7792: Make symbols and strings the same thing

> result = some.rpc_method(foo:123, bar:"baz")
> ...
I believe it is time now with the advent of Ruby 3 to revisit this feature request.
Although maybe not quite like it is stated right now.
What are your feelings about it? subtileos (Daniel Ferreira)

01:22 AM Ruby Feature #7792: Make symbols and strings the same thing

Hi Bill
> One example:
> ...
With symbols being garbage collected now is this functionality broken or are you still relying on symbols over strings for your solution?
Thanks,
Daniel subtileos (Daniel Ferreira)