Ruby Issue Tracking System

04/08/2018

07:26 AM Ruby trunk Feature #14669: Regexp does not expose the amount of capture groups.

Can you give a few examples of how this may be used, and explain what's the purpose of getting the number of capture ...

03/29/2018

06:04 AM Ruby trunk Bug #14650: Remove problematic separator '\0' of Dir.glob and Dir.[]

中村さん、こんにちは。

おそらく中村さんのではなくて、ブラウザですが、同じバグを10個も作りました。
(https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14643 から
https://bugs.rub...

03/26/2018

02:08 AM Ruby trunk Bug #14556 (Closed): Please fetch Ripper's new features from nobu's patches bag (irb-ripper branch)

Closed at request of original poster.

03/15/2018

07:54 AM Ruby trunk Feature #14476: Adding same_all? for checking whether all items in an Array are same

duerst (Martin Dürst) wrote:
> Example:
> [1, 2, 3].uniform? % => true
> [:a, :b, :c].uniform? % => true
> [1, ...

07:42 AM Ruby trunk Feature #14476: Adding same_all? for checking whether all items in an Array are same

matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
> * uniform? - I like this best, but can uniform mean equality?
When seeing u...

03/14/2018

02:56 AM Ruby trunk Feature #14602: Version of dig that raises error if a key is not present

Would a keyword parameter to dig work for you?
E.g. `hash.dig!(:name, :middle, raise_error: true)` or something si...

03/09/2018

01:48 AM Ruby trunk Bug #14592 (Rejected): /Users/cathyyee/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.0@global/gems/did_you_mean-1.0.0/lib/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/name_error_checkers/variable_name_checker.rb:10: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x000000000000cb

03/08/2018

06:29 AM Ruby trunk Bug #14588: math library functions should NOT raise exceptions

Two points of advice:
1) I was not able to find the issue you mention on github. Please provide a pointer.
2) I...

02/28/2018

05:43 AM Ruby trunk Feature #14551: What's missing to switch to Git instead of using Subversion?

Two points that would be worse for git, the first is general, the second is personal:
1) Revisions become meaningles...

02/27/2018

01:36 AM Ruby trunk Feature #14546: Hash#delete!

marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) wrote:
> As Matz clearly stated, even if a long time ago, bang is not strictly for ...