Ruby Issue Tracking System

10/08/2018

04:03 PM Ruby trunk Feature #14912: Introduce pattern matching syntax

I don't have anything specific to say about this particular proposal, I just want to point out that a lot of people h...

03:26 PM Ruby trunk Bug #14652: ruby -e "p ARGV" **/* is reasonably but slow

sanae (Sanae Artoria) wrote:
> ~~~ ruby
> C:\Users\Administrator>ruby -e "p ARGV" **/*
>
> ~~~
>
> Runs slow ...

03:16 PM Ruby trunk Bug #14541: Class variables have broken semantics, let's fix them

Hanmac (Hans Mackowiak) wrote:
> @Eregon: the problem is the other way around ...
>
> a class variable in a super...

03:10 PM Ruby trunk Feature #14423: Enumerator from single object

[Oops. I didn't see #14781.]
The general version of this method is the category-theoretical dual of a `fold` (call...

01:44 PM Ruby trunk Feature #14164: [Suggestion] Type system for ruby 3x to be usable for e. g. rubocop or autogenerating crystal code and so forth

I feel that most discussions about "type systems" or "types" for Ruby suffer from a serious lack of unambiguous defin...

01/07/2018

09:26 AM Ruby trunk Feature #12589: VM performance improvement proposal

vmakarov (Vladimir Makarov) wrote:
> For example, GCC/LLVM optimizes well int->fixnum->int->... conversions but they...

01:55 AM Ruby trunk Bug #14069: Document order of elements in Set

*Is* that actually guaranteed by the specification? Can you point to any specification or documentation or official s...

01:50 AM Ruby trunk Misc #13968: [Ruby 3.x perhaps] - A (minimal?) static variant of ruby

Just to make sure I understand what you are talking about, when you write "Ruby", do you *really* mean "Ruby", or do ...

10/06/2017

12:53 AM Ruby trunk Feature #12115: Add Symbol#call to allow to_proc shorthand with arguments

knu (Akinori MUSHA) wrote:
> Wouldn't Array#to_proc make sense?
>
> ```ruby
> class Array
> def to_proc
> ...

05/13/2017

07:01 PM Ruby trunk Feature #10548: remove callcc (Callcc is now going obsoleted. Please use Fiber.)

jphelps (Jeremy Phelps) wrote:
> I just learned that Ruby has continuations. Then I learned that they're considered ...