Feature #12129
open
syntactic sugar for dynamic method dispatch `object_expression:method_name_expression(1, 2)`
Updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) almost 9 years ago
Describe more concretely and preferably tell us why do you need it, please.
Matz.
Updated by bughit (bug hit) almost 9 years ago
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Describe more concretely and preferably tell us why do you need it, please.
object_expression:method_name_expression(1, 2)
would be sugar for
object_expression.__send__(method_name_expression, arg1, arg2)
like any sugar, you can live without it, but I think a dynamic language should have it.
e.g. in javascript: object_expression[method_name_expression](arg1, arg2)
Updated by jwmittag (Jörg W Mittag) almost 9 years ago
bug hit wrote:
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Describe more concretely and preferably tell us why do you need it, please.
object_expression:method_name_expression(1, 2)would be sugar for
object_expression.__send__(method_name_expression, arg1, arg2)
Please, for the love of all that is holy, regardless of whatever syntax sugar you choose, make it translate or equivalent to public_send, not __send__!