Actions
Misc #14581
closedUpdate JSON docs
Status:
Third Party's Issue
Assignee:
-
Description
What is here:
- adding docs for (questionable, yet present) "additions" feature;
- cleaning up (both formatting and formulations) docs of
JSON.generate
: current docs are poorly formatted and its documentation shifted more towards (internal)State
object than just options; - some other style/formatting cleanups.
Files
Updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev) almost 7 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) almost 7 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Third Party's Issue
Can you submit an upstream repository first?
Updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev) almost 7 years ago
@hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) Ah, OK. I've tried to find the "upstream" version but failed to do so. Thanks for pointing it out.
Updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev) almost 7 years ago
@hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) BTW, what's the maintenance status of the upstream? Currently, I can see there:
- the last PR is merged in October, last before that in Jun, last before that in spring, there are several uncommented PRs (including ones with serious performance improvements, or security issue discussion/PR open for 3 years in a row)
- there are a lot of unaddressed issues, and of closed ones, the last that was touched by repo owner was just silent closing (of irrelevant ones?) in April
I was thinking about doing several PRs to clean up the legacy parts of the library & docs, but now I am not sure if there would be anybody on the receiving end of those PRs.
Updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev) almost 7 years ago
(In addition, as far as I understand, there is some discrepancy between "standalone" json
and in-Ruby json
: the latter does not include "pure" part of JSON library, virtually rendering half of its code and docs false.)
Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) almost 7 years ago
what's the maintenance status of the upstream?
It's active.
Updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev) about 5 years ago
Actions
Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0