Bug #15636
closed::Socket#to_a hangs Ruby interpreter
Description
ruby -v: ruby 2.6.1p33 (2019-01-30 revision 66950) [x86_64-linux]
Reproducible script¶
require 'socket'
s = Socket.new(:INET, :STREAM)
s.connect Socket.pack_sockaddr_in(80, 'example.com')
s.to_a
Result¶
Ruby hangs infinitely.
Expected¶
Socket instance converted to an array representation (whatever that might be). I expect this as to_a comes from the ::Enumerable mixin included in ::IO - one of ::Socket's parent classes.
Background¶
I came across this while working on Redis client serialization in our Rollbar SDK here: https://github.com/rollbar/rollbar-gem/blob/master/spec/rollbar/item_spec.rb#L682-L686. This becomes a problem when you try to use ActiveSupport JSON to serialize a Redis client instance:
activesupport: v4.2.8
redis: v4.1.0
-
Object#as_jsoninactive_support/core_ext/object/json.rb#50<- callsas_jsonon theinstance_values -
Hash@as_jsoninactive_support/core_ext/object/json.rb#159<- callsas_json -
Enumerable#as_jsoninlib/active_support/core_ext/object/json.rb#128<- calls to_a on aRedis::Connection::TCPSocketobject
Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) over 6 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Rejected
I don't think it's a bug of socket library.
arturmoczulski (Artur Moczulski) wrote:
Result¶
Ruby hangs infinitely.
No, it desn't. It just takes a long time. It properly exits after 60 seconds (from my machine at least).
Expected¶
Socket instance converted to an array representation (whatever that might be). I expect this as
to_acomes from the::Enumerablemixin included in::IO- one of::Socket's parent classes.
Right. This expectation, by far, is accurate.
What is the key point here is that IO's to_a method is ultimately IO#each_line, which reads everything from the IO to split into lines.
In the reproduction code the socket connected to example.com:80, then waits for some response. But in HTTP, you have to send some request before you expect a response. So the remote endpoint waits for your program to send something. After some period of time the remote side gives up. It closes the connection and everything resumes as expected.
Background¶
I am not sure if your problem ultimately sources this behaviour. Because this is a pretty much standardised protocol.