Bug #17101
closedYAML.load_file: Massive slowdown under Ruby 2.7 vs. Ruby 2.4
Description
When use Ruby 2.4, the following program runs fast, After ungrade to Ruby 2.7, the same program runs very very slow. Please unzip the attach first for test.
require 'yaml'
YAML.load_file('qlnv_h_h.yaml')
Files
Updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L) over 4 years ago
You used the phrase 'runs very very slow'. I found 2.7 slower, as below. What were the times you had?
Using Psych.safe_load, got the following for several mingw builds, along with an mswin master build.
All returned a hash with 608 keys. Tests done on an older slow notebook.
Interesting that the mswin build was much faster than all the others. I should run some of the Ruby benchmarks, as that was unexpected.
Time Psych Ruby
19 2.2.2 2.4.10
41 3.0.2 2.5.8
38 3.1.0 2.6.6
26 3.1.0 2.7.1
25 3.1.0 2.8.0dev (2020-08-03T10:46:39Z master 1d637b1f5e) [x64-mingw32]
12 3.1.0 2.8.0dev (2020-08-03T10:46:39Z master 1d637b1f5e) [x64-mswin64_140]
Updated by S_H_ (Shun Hiraoka) over 4 years ago
I tried this benchmark in several ruby's(Ubuntu18.04 in WSL2. using rbenv
).
prelude: |
require 'yaml'
benchmark:
load_file: YAML.load_file('qlnv_h_h.yaml')
loop_count: 1
And, result.
sh@MyComputer:~/rubydev/bugs$ benchmark-driver yml.yaml --output compare --rbenv '2.4.4;2.5.8;2.6.6;2.7.1;2.8.0-dev'
Calculating -------------------------------------
2.4.4 2.5.8 2.6.6 2.7.1 2.8.0-dev
load_file 0.113 0.075 0.076 0.058 0.134 i/s - 1.000 times in 8.839451s 13.406090s 13.240691s 17.256679s 7.435239s
Comparison:
load_file
2.8.0-dev: 0.1 i/s
2.4.4: 0.1 i/s - 1.19x slower
2.6.6: 0.1 i/s - 1.78x slower
2.5.8: 0.1 i/s - 1.80x slower
2.7.1: 0.1 i/s - 2.32x slower
Between 2.5
and 2.7
is slow, but master(2.8.9-dev)
is very fast(faster than 2.4
!).
And checked yaml
versions(in these ruby's).
Ruby version | YAML version |
---|---|
2.8.0-dev | 0.2.5 |
2.7.1 | 0.2.1 |
2.6.6 | 0.2.1 |
2.5.8 | 0.1.7 |
2.4.4 | 0.1.7 |
Updated by fitmap (Justin Peal) over 4 years ago
I run this program on Windows 10 64-bit. Very very slow: I wait more than 10 minutes, then I press Ctrl-Break. Now I install Ruby 2.6, then the program runs as fast as Ruby 2.4.
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
I tried this on OpenBSD, and ruby 2.7 and 3.0 were faster than ruby 2.4 (all of these use libyaml 0.2.2):
/usr/local/bin/ruby27: 0.1 i/s
/usr/local/bin/ruby30: 0.1 i/s - 1.00x slower
/usr/local/bin/ruby24: 0.0 i/s - 1.46x slower
/usr/local/bin/ruby26: 0.0 i/s - 1.83x slower
/usr/local/bin/ruby25: 0.0 i/s - 1.98x slower
I also tested on Windows, where performance on ruby 3.0 and 2.7 is not as good as 2.4, but still much better than 2.5 and 2.6 (these use whatever libyaml is embedded in RubyInstaller):
C:\\ruby24-x64\\bin\\ruby: 0.1 i/s
C:\\ruby30-x64\\bin\\ruby: 0.0 i/s - 1.26x slower
C:\\ruby27-x64\\bin\\ruby: 0.0 i/s - 1.30x slower
C:\\ruby26-x64\\bin\\ruby: 0.0 i/s - 2.06x slower
C:\\ruby25-x64\\bin\\ruby: 0.0 i/s - 2.13x slower
It's likely the decrease in performance in Windows on ruby 2.7 and 3.0 is due to different versions of libyaml:
D:\>c:\Ruby30-x64\bin\ruby -r yaml -e "p Psych::LIBYAML_VERSION"
"0.2.5"
D:\>c:\Ruby27-x64\bin\ruby -r yaml -e "p Psych::LIBYAML_VERSION"
"0.2.2"
D:\>c:\Ruby26-x64\bin\ruby -r yaml -e "p Psych::LIBYAML_VERSION"
"0.2.1"
D:\>c:\Ruby25-x64\bin\ruby -r yaml -e "p Psych::LIBYAML_VERSION"
"0.1.6"
D:\>c:\Ruby24-x64\bin\ruby -r yaml -e "p Psych::LIBYAML_VERSION"
"0.1.6"
There no longer appears to be a massive slowdown, and it appears that for the same libyaml version, ruby 2.7 and 3.0 are faster, so I'm going to close this.