yaml#load_file too slow under Psych
Unzip attached folder and run test.rb. Remember time output. Now uncomment the ENGINE line so we switch from Psych to Syck as yaml engine, and do it again. On my machine, time for Psych is about twice the time for Syck. (Time under old yaml under Ruby 1.8.7 is comparable to Syck here.)
The example is artificial but in the actual use-case in my application this doubling of the time is killing performance for me. I regard this as a severe bug. I expect at least comparable performance. In my view the adoption of Psych yaml engine in 1.9.3 has been prematurely forced upon users, and should be rolled back until performance is comparable to Syck. At least the default should be reversed; for now, Syck should be the default and users can then choose Psych if they want it.
ruby 1.9.3p194 (2012-04-20 revision 35410) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0]
#1 [ruby-core:47547] Updated by mattneub (Matt Neuburg) almost 5 years ago
Please ignore the previous test file. I've come up with a much better test. This is indicative of the real-world use-case. On my machine, the output is:
Psych 17.156296968460083 Syck 5.016614198684692 Resulting loaded hash the same? true
So Psych is taking over three times as long as Syck to load and parse the file. Times under Ruby 1.8.7 are comparable to the Syck time shown here. So this is a massive slowdown under Ruby 1.9.3.
#3 [ruby-core:55932] Updated by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) about 4 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
The latest release of the psych gem cuts the time for this benchmark. It may still be slightly slower than Syck, but the parsers are different (YAML 1.0 vs YAML 1.1), so we can't really compare apples to apples. I'll continue to reduce bottlenecks as I can.
[aaron@higgins yamlLoadFileTest2]$ ruby test.rb
Psych version: 1.3.4
[aaron@higgins yamlLoadFileTest2]$ ruby -I ../../git/psych/lib test.rb
Psych version: 2.0.0