Recently Liked by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme)
-
Feature #20443: Allow Major GC's to be disabled
Liked 14 days ago
-
Feature #20318: Pattern matching `case ... in` support for triple-dot arguments: #20318#note-5
Liked 20 days ago
-
Feature #6648: Provide a standard API for retrieving all command-line flags passed to Ruby
Liked 20 days ago
-
Misc #20232: Document Kernel#require and Module#autoload concurrency guarantees
Liked 2 months ago
-
Feature #20215: Introduce `IO#readable?`: #20215#note-7
Liked 3 months ago
-
Feature #20266: New syntax to escape embed strings in Regexp literal
Liked 3 months ago
-
Feature #18576: Rename `ASCII-8BIT` encoding to `BINARY`: #18576#note-39
Liked 3 months ago
-
Feature #20205: Enable `frozen_string_literal` by default
Liked 3 months ago
-
Feature #20205: Enable `frozen_string_literal` by default: #20205#note-25
Liked 3 months ago
-
Bug #18156: 3.0.2 configuration checks by default for C++ compiler instead of C?: #18156#note-4
Liked 4 months ago
-
Feature #18576: Rename `ASCII-8BIT` encoding to `BINARY`: #18576#note-28
Liked 5 months ago
-
Feature #20066: Reduce Implicit Array/Hash Allocations For Method Calls Involving Splats
Liked 5 months ago
-
Bug #20064: Inconsistent behavior between array splat *nil and hash splat **nil
Liked 5 months ago
-
Feature #18368: Range#step semantics for non-Numeric ranges
Liked 5 months ago
-
Feature #18576: Rename `ASCII-8BIT` encoding to `BINARY`: #18576#note-12
Liked 5 months ago
-
Feature #20024: SyntaxError subclasses: #20024#note-3
Liked 5 months ago
-
Feature #19972: Install default/bundled gems into dedicated directories
Liked 6 months ago
-
Feature #14548: Allow some_array&.[1] to be a valid syntax
Liked 6 months ago
-
Bug #19985: Confusing error message when nonexistent `Pathname` for `require`: #19985#note-5
Liked 6 months ago
-
Feature #15554: warn/error passing a block to a method which never use a block
Liked 6 months ago
-
Feature #19979: Allow methods to declare that they don't accept a block via `&nil`
Liked 6 months ago
-
Bug #19918: Should `a[&b]=c` be syntax valid?: #19918#note-4
Liked 7 months ago
-
Feature #12075: some container#nonempty?: #12075#note-24
Liked 8 months ago
-
Feature #12075: some container#nonempty?: #12075#note-10
Liked 8 months ago
-
Bug #17354: Module#const_source_location is misleading for constants awaiting autoload: #17354#note-8
Liked 8 months ago