Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #12831

closed

/\X/ (extended grapheme cluster) can't pass unicode.org's GraphemeBreakTest

Added by mtsmfm (Fumiaki Matsushima) about 8 years ago. Updated about 8 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Target version:
-
[ruby-core:77586]

Description

I'm trying to replace Rails's grapheme implementation (http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveSupport/Multibyte/Unicode.html#method-i-unpack_graphemes) with Ruby's extended grapheme cluster (/X/).
https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/26743

I noticed that Ruby's grapheme cluster can't pass unicode.org's GraphemeBreakTest.

Following test script will fail on Ruby 2.2/2.3

require 'rubygems'
require 'open-uri'
require 'test/unit'

UNICODE_VERSION =
  if Gem::Version.new(RUBY_VERSION) >= Gem::Version.new("2.3.0")
    "8.0.0"
  else
    "7.0.0"
  end

class TestGrapheme < Test::Unit::TestCase
  # https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v5.0.0.1/activesupport/test/multibyte_grapheme_break_conformance_test.rb#L37
  def test_breaks
    each_line_of_break_tests do |*cols|
      *clusters, comment = *cols
      string = clusters.map {|c| c.pack("U*") }.join
      assert_equal clusters, string.scan(/\X/).map(&:codepoints), comment
    end
  end

  def each_line_of_break_tests(&block)
    lines = 0
    max_test_lines = 0 # Don't limit below 21, because that's the header of the testfile
    URI.parse("http://www.unicode.org/Public/#{UNICODE_VERSION}/ucd/auxiliary/GraphemeBreakTest.txt").open do |f|
      until f.eof? || (max_test_lines > 21 && lines > max_test_lines)
        lines += 1
        line = f.gets.chomp!
        next if line.empty? || line.start_with?("#")

        cols, comment = line.split("#")
        # Cluster breaks are represented by ÷
        clusters = cols.split("÷").map { |e| e.strip }.reject { |e| e.empty? }
        clusters = clusters.map do |cluster|
          # Codepoints within each cluster are separated by ×
          codepoints = cluster.split("×").map { |e| e.strip }.reject { |e| e.empty? }
          # codepoints are in hex in the test suite, pack wants them as integers
          codepoints.map { |codepoint| codepoint.to_i(16) }
        end

        # The tests contain a solitary U+D800 <Non Private Use High
        # Surrogate, First> character, which Ruby does not allow to stand
        # alone in a UTF-8 string. So we'll just skip it.
        next if clusters.flatten.include?(0xd800)

        clusters << comment.strip

        yield(*clusters)
      end
    end
  end
end

https://gist.github.com/mtsmfm/38f46882c3d4ccde35c269594fc24ebc

I found an issue on Onigmo (https://github.com/k-takata/Onigmo/issues/46)
but I couldn't on bugs.ruby-lang.org so I created this ticket.

I'm unfamiliar with grapheme so please tell me if I get something wrong.

Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) about 8 years ago

  • Assignee set to naruse (Yui NARUSE)
  • Tracker changed from Bug to Feature
  • Status changed from Open to Assigned

Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) about 8 years ago

We looked at this issue in todays developer meeting and assigned it to Yui. But no one there had implementation of this. It might need some time. Stay tuned!

Actions #3

Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) about 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to Closed

Applied in changeset r56949.


Regexp supports Unicoe 9.0.0's \X

  • meta character \X matches Unicode 9.0.0 characters with some workarounds
    for UTR #51 Unicode Emoji, Version 4.0 emoji zwj sequences.
    [Feature #12831] [ruby-core:77586]

The term "character" can have many meanings bytes, codepoints, combined
characters, and so on. "grapheme cluster" is highest one of such words,
which means user-perceived characters.
Unicode Standard Annex #29 UNICODE TEXT SEGMENTATION specifies how to
handle grapheme clusters (extended grapheme cluster).
But some specs aren't updated to current situation because Unicode Emoji
is rapidly extended without well definition.
It breaks the precondition of UTR#29 "Grapheme cluster boundaries can be
easily tested by looking at immediately adjacent characters". (the
sentence will be removed in the next version)
Though some of its detail are described in Unicode Technical Report #51
UNICODE EMOJI but it is not merged into UTR#29 yet.

http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/
http://unicode.org/reports/tr51/
http://unicode.org/Public/emoji/4.0/

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like0
Like0Like0Like0