Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #16480

closed

Ruby 2.7, C++, and rb_define_method compilation error

Bug #16480: Ruby 2.7, C++, and rb_define_method compilation error

Added by jasonroelofs (Jason Roelofs) almost 6 years ago. Updated almost 6 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Target version:
-
ruby -v:
ruby 2.7.0p0 (2019-12-25 revision 647ee6f091) [x86_64-darwin18]
[ruby-core:96656]

Description

I maintain the Rice library which provides constructs for exposing C++ libraries into Ruby. With Ruby 2.7.0 I've got a hard compilation failure that I'm not sure how to fix.[1]

Diving into this, I've found that rb_define_method, when compiled under C++, is now a macro that uses templates to choose the correct overload by the given arity. However, this seems to require a constexpr-compatible use of rb_define_method, making the API unavailable for more dynamic uses[1].

The PR that made these changes is here[3].

I've looked for ways to get around this macro change but have been unable to make anything work. Is there a way I've missed to directly call the underlying C API function or is this now simply not possible with Ruby 2.7.0?

[1] https://github.com/jasonroelofs/rice/issues/119
[2] https://github.com/jasonroelofs/rice/blob/master/rice/detail/method_data.cpp#L78
[3] https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2461

Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) almost 6 years ago Actions #1 [ruby-core:96677]

  • Status changed from Open to Assigned
  • Assignee set to nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)

It indeed seems to be a bug. For C extensions, that arity argument can be a variable. There is a fallback code. But for C++, there is no way to accept non-constexpr arities. This is a problem.

@nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) Can you provide us a workaround? Or revert, because there is no way to support the extension library?

Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) almost 6 years ago Actions #2 [ruby-core:96739]

Doesn't #undef rb_define_method in that file work?

Updated by jasonroelofs (Jason Roelofs) almost 6 years ago Actions #3 [ruby-core:96744]

nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) wrote:

Doesn't #undef rb_define_method in that file work?

Ah yes it looks like it does and thanks for putting together the PR.

Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) almost 6 years ago Actions #4 [ruby-core:96774]

  • Status changed from Assigned to Closed

The arities must be eventually compile-time constants for the nature.
I think this case is quite special, and it is resolved in that project.

Actions

Also available in: PDF Atom