Bug #18893
closedDon't redefine memcpy(3)
Description
It is Undefined Behavior, by any standard ever issued.
See what I have in my system right now:
alx@asus5775:/usr/include$ grepc memcpy
./string.h:43:
extern void *memcpy (void *__restrict __dest, const void *__restrict __src,
size_t __n) __THROW __nonnull ((1, 2));
./x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby-3.0.0/rb_mjit_min_header-3.0.4.h:1520:
extern void *memcpy (void *__restrict __dest, const void *__restrict __src,
size_t __n) __attribute__ ((__nothrow__ , __leaf__)) __attribute__ ((__nonnull__ (1, 2)));
./x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby-3.0.0/rb_mjit_min_header-3.0.4.h:1670:
extern __inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) __attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__)) __attribute__ ((__artificial__)) void *
__attribute__ ((__nothrow__ , __leaf__)) memcpy (void *__restrict __dest, const void *__restrict __src, size_t __len)
{
return __builtin___memcpy_chk (__dest, __src, __len,
__builtin_object_size (__dest, 0));
}
./ruby-3.0.0/ruby/internal/memory.h:278:
#define memcpy ruby_nonempty_memcpy
./x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby-3.0.0/rb_mjit_min_header-3.0.4.h:22679:
#define memcpy ruby_nonempty_memcpy
$ grepc ruby_nonempty_memcpy
./ruby-3.0.0/ruby/internal/memory.h:266:
static inline void *
ruby_nonempty_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n)
{
if (n) {
return memcpy(dest, src, n);
}
else {
return dest;
}
}
./x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby-3.0.0/rb_mjit_min_header-3.0.4.h:5673:
__attribute__((__nonnull__ (1)))
__attribute__((__returns_nonnull__))
static inline void *
ruby_nonempty_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n)
{
if (n) {
return memcpy(dest, src, n);
}
else {
return dest;
}
}
Some code that I maintain includes some ruby headers, which end up defining memcpy(3) to that thing. Then, my code calls memcpy(3) from a function, which happens to be inline (yes, inline, not static inline, which is a horrible thing), and I get an error from the compiler, for using a static function within a non-static inline function.
So, I'd like you to please remove that definition from public headers, and refrain from redefining any ISO C functions.
If not, please define it to something not broken (and yes, static inline is broken, as it produces duplicated code when not inlined; you could use [[gnu::always_inline]] if you want to keep static, but don't). Just C99 inline would be reasonable. See also: https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/tech/inline.html
Thanks,
Alex