Bug #19468
closedRuby 3.2: net/http sets UTF-8 encoding for binary responses
Description
net/http on Ruby 3.2 has changed the encoding of binary responses from SSL connected hosts (non-SSL connections are not affected):
# req.rb
require 'openssl'
require 'net/http'
puts "openssl ext: #{OpenSSL::VERSION}"
puts "openssl lib: #{OpenSSL::OPENSSL_VERSION}"
puts "net-protocol: #{Net::Protocol::VERSION}"
puts "net-http: #{Net::HTTP::VERSION}"
puts Net::HTTP.get(URI(ARGV.first)).encoding
Ruby 3.1 (with updated net-protocol and net-http libs):
$ ruby -v
ruby 3.1.2p20 (2022-04-12 revision 4491bb740a) [x86_64-linux]
$ ruby req.rb https://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/manual/gzip.pdf
openssl ext: 3.0.0
openssl lib: OpenSSL 1.1.1n 15 Mar 2022
net-protocol: 0.2.1
net-http: 0.3.2
ASCII-8BIT # <== CORRECT
Ruby 3.2 (latest git revision):
$ ruby -v
ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-22 revision 65ab2c1ef2) [x86_64-linux]
$ ruby req.rb https://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/manual/gzip.pdf
openssl ext: 3.1.0
openssl lib: OpenSSL 1.1.1n 15 Mar 2022
net-protocol: 0.2.1
net-http: 0.3.2
UTF-8 # <== WRONG
I've tracked the problem down to the SSL socket call at https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/9557c8edf2dcf18fdece066c596a71696b2f2b30/lib/net/protocol.rb#L218.
The string returned has the encoding set to ASCII-8BIT
, but #ascii_only?
also always reports true, even when there are non-ascii bytes. This seems to be a bug, and is the probably cause of the change in behavior in net/http. On Ruby 3.1 concatenating the result of reading the SSL socket to a UTF-8 string produces an ASCII-8BIT string. On Ruby 3.2 the concatenation produces a UTF-8 string.
Here's a program demonstrating the behavior of the SSL socket:
# ssltest.rb
require 'openssl'
require 'uri'
url = URI(ARGV.first)
path = url.path
path += '?' + url.query if url.query
req = "GET #{path} HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: #{url.hostname}\r\nAccept: */*\r\n\r\n"
sock = OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket.open(url.hostname, url.port || HTTPS.default_https_port)
sock.connect
sock.write(req)
sleep(1)
loop do
sleep(0.1)
b = ''.b
r = sock.read_nonblock(1024 * 16, b, exception: false)
break unless String === r
p [r.bytesize, r.encoding.to_s, r.ascii_only?]
end
Ruby 3.1:
$ ruby ssltest.rb https://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/manual/gzip.pdf
[475, "ASCII-8BIT", true]
[16384, "ASCII-8BIT", false] # <== always false (except HTTP header): CORRECT
[16384, "ASCII-8BIT", false]
...
[13927, "ASCII-8BIT", false]
Ruby 3.2:
$ ruby ssltest.rb https://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/manual/gzip.pdf
[475, "ASCII-8BIT", true]
[16384, "ASCII-8BIT", true] # <== always true: WRONG
[16384, "ASCII-8BIT", true]
...
[13927, "ASCII-8BIT", true]
Updated by romuloceccon (Rômulo Ceccon) almost 2 years ago
Another way to reproduce the problem:
$ ruby
require "zlib"
p Zlib::Inflate.new.inflate(Zlib.deflate("\u3042".b)).ascii_only?
p Zlib::Inflate.new.inflate(Zlib.deflate("\u3042".b), buffer: "".b).ascii_only?
^D
false # <== correct
true # <== wrong
Bisecting points to https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/b0b9f7201a as the offending commit.
This patch fixes the issue with both zlib and openssl:
diff --git a/string.c b/string.c
index 6773ed2d86..95f023232a 100644
--- a/string.c
+++ b/string.c
@@ -2460,6 +2460,7 @@ rb_str_modify_expand(VALUE str, long expand)
else if (expand > 0) {
RESIZE_CAPA_TERM(str, len + expand, termlen);
}
+ ENC_CODERANGE_CLEAR(str);
}
/* As rb_str_modify(), but don't clear coderange */
I could fix zlib's rb_inflate_inflate
(https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/65ab2c1ef2/ext/zlib/zlib.c#L2167) and openssl's ossl_ssl_read_internal
(https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/65ab2c1ef2/ext/openssl/ossl_ssl.c#L1929) instead, but I don't fully understand the reasoning of the change.
Updated by byroot (Jean Boussier) almost 2 years ago
This patch fixes the issue with both zlib and openssl:
Interesting, that you for the bug report. One problem though is that the point of https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/b0b9f7201a, as to not clear the coderange as often when it wasn't required.
Expanding the string capacity shouldn't change the coderange.
So the missing CODERANGE_CLEAR
is likely in whatever function calls this one. I'll try to see if I can track it down.
Updated by byroot (Jean Boussier) almost 2 years ago
Actually, the assumption in https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/b0b9f7201a might have been incorrect. The function is called rb_str_modify_expand
and rb_str_modify
does clear the coderange, so it is somewhat legitimate for extension to assume it include what rb_str_modify
does. SO your patch seem correct to me.
Updated by byroot (Jean Boussier) almost 2 years ago
- Backport changed from 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN to 2.7: DONTNEED, 3.0: DONTNEED, 3.1: DONTNEED, 3.2: REQUIRED
Updated by romuloceccon (Rômulo Ceccon) almost 2 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Applied in changeset git|d78ae78fd76e556e281a743c75bea4c0bb81ed8c.
rb_str_modify_expand: clear the string coderange
[Bug #19468]
b0b9f7201acab05c2a3ad92c3043a1f01df3e17f errornously stopped
clearing the coderange.
Since rb_str_modify
clears it, rb_str_modify_expand
should too.
Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) almost 2 years ago
- Backport changed from 2.7: DONTNEED, 3.0: DONTNEED, 3.1: DONTNEED, 3.2: REQUIRED to 2.7: DONTNEED, 3.0: DONTNEED, 3.1: DONTNEED, 3.2: DONE
ruby_3_2 b309c246ee70926d593d3857e1625202e2d0f67b merged revision(s) d78ae78fd76e556e281a743c75bea4c0bb81ed8c.