Actions
Bug #21260
closedduping stringio objects shares cursors
Status:
Feedback
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
ruby -v:
ruby 3.4.2 (2025-02-15 revision d2930f8e7a) +PRISM [x86_64-darwin23]
Description
I've found that, if I .dup
a stringio, when I read one of the objects, the cursor also moves internally on the other:
require "stringio"
s1 = StringIO.new("test")
s2 = s1.dup
s1.read #=> "test"
s2.read #=> ""
s1.rewind
s2.rewind
s2.read #=> "test"
s1.read #=> ""
s1.pos #=> 4
s2.pos #=> 4
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) 4 days ago
This is how IO#dup
works. What would be the benefit of StringIO#dup
behaving differently?
f = File.open('filename.rb')
f2 = f.dup
f2.pos # => 0
f.read 4
f2.pos # => 4
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) 4 days ago
- Status changed from Open to Feedback
Updated by chucke (Tiago Cardoso) 4 days ago
I see. Alignment with File makes sense. At least my expectation was that, by dup'ing the IO object, I'd receive a separate independent object with which to traverse the file. But perhaps that does not make sense, as at least in the case of File, that'd mean a second OS file descriptor, and that's heavy? Also not sure whether this expectation is general.
Actions
Like0
Like0Like0Like0