Actions
Bug #2199
closedObject#method should call respond_to_missing?(sym, true)
    Bug #2199:
    Object#method should call respond_to_missing?(sym, true)
  
ruby -v:
ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-10-13 trunk 25317) [x86_64-darwin10.0.0]
Backport:
Description
=begin
Is there any reason I'm missing?
class A
def respond_to_missing?(method, private = false)
method == :is_private && private
end
 def is_private2
 end
 private :is_private2
end
A.new.method(:is_private2) # ==> #<Method: A#is_private2>...
A.new.method(:is_private) # ==> NameError: undefined method is_private' for class A'
If not:
diff --git a/proc.c b/proc.c
index 5ed3c01..b7c632c 100644
--- a/proc.c
+++ b/proc.c
@@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ mnew(VALUE klass, VALUE obj, ID id, VALUE mclass, int scope)
VALUE sym = ID2SYM(id);
     if (obj != Qundef && !rb_method_basic_definition_p(klass, rmiss)) {
- 
if (RTEST(rb_funcall(obj, rmiss, 1, sym))) { 
- 
if (RTEST(rb_funcall(obj, rmiss, 2, sym, Qtrue))) { def = ALLOC(rb_method_definition_t); def->type = VM_METHOD_TYPE_MISSING; def->original_id = id; 
=end
        
          
          Updated by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) about 16 years ago
          
          
        
        
      
      - Subject changed from Object#method should call respond_to_missing(sym, true) to Object#method should call respond_to_missing?(sym, true)
 - Assignee set to matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
 
=begin
=end
        
          
          Updated by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) about 16 years ago
          
          
        
        
      
      - Status changed from Open to Closed
 
=begin
Applied in r25325.
=end
Actions