I think we should deprecate the
Random::DEFAULT constant, it doesn't make sense anymore and it's longer than using Random class methods (Random.rand) or Kernel instance methods (#rand).
Also, people might expect it to be global.
If users want a Random instance they should just use
Random.new, not assume there is a global instance in Random::DEFAULT, which is actually rather misleading now (Random::DEFAULT is no longer an instance of Random).
Also note that JRuby & TruffleRuby use a per-thread instance for Kernel#rand, etc, to avoid contention (otherwise it becomes a huge source of contention when threads run in parallel).
Which means on those implementations using Random::DEFAULT was inefficient (extra synchronization).
So for all these reasons I think it's time to deprecate
Random::DEFAULT and then later remove it (in 3.1?).
I don't think there is any use case for
Random::DEFAULT, but happy to hear if there is and there is no trivial replacement.
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) 11 months ago
I don't think there is any use case for Random::DEFAULT, but happy to hear if there is and there is no trivial replacement.
As mentioned here: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17322#note-7
there are several users.
For example, I will use
Random::DEFAULT for the default random generator for dice rolling method like:
def roll rnd = Random::DEFAULT rnd.rand(6)+1 end
for hobby use (non-serious use case).
Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 11 months ago
It seems pretty rare to need to supply a custom Random instance.
But in such a case, it would be easy to create an explicit one in e.g. the constructor:
class Dice def initialize(random = Random.new) @random = random end def roll @random.rand(6) + 1 end end
If it needs to scale and run well with parallel threads, the built-in
Kernel#rand is probably the only good option.
Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 10 months ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed