Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #18381

open

Default vs Bundled gems

Added by vo.x (Vit Ondruch) about 1 year ago. Updated 8 days ago.

Status:
Assigned
Priority:
Normal
Target version:
-
ruby -v:
ruby 3.1.0dev (2021-12-01 master 0b53a8895f) [x86_64-linux]
[ruby-core:106390]

Description

Could there be documented what is the difference between default and bundled gems? E.g.

  • Are the Bundled gems considered a part of StdLib or not?
  • What is general strategy for the future, seeing more and more gems moving from default to bundled gems in Ruby 3.1
  • Default gems does not need to be listed in Gemfile where Bundled gems needs to be listed in Gemfile
  • Default gems can be used without RubyGems where Bundled gems requires RubyGems

Updated by bkuhlmann (Brooke Kuhlmann) about 1 year ago

💡Not sure if this helps, but Ruby Standard Gems is always a great source of reference. I use it often, myself.

Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Open to Assigned
  • Assignee set to hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)

Updated by chooosen (Piotr Wasiak) about 1 year ago

:+1:

Documentation would solve probably my question about:
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18400

Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) 8 days ago

I'll document this.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like1
Like0Like0Like0Like0