Actions
Bug #18381
closedDefault vs Bundled gems
Description
Could there be documented what is the difference between default and bundled gems? E.g.
- Are the Bundled gems considered a part of StdLib or not?
- What is general strategy for the future, seeing more and more gems moving from default to bundled gems in Ruby 3.1
- Default gems does not need to be listed in Gemfile where Bundled gems needs to be listed in Gemfile
- Default gems can be used without RubyGems where Bundled gems requires RubyGems
Updated by bkuhlmann (Brooke Kuhlmann) almost 3 years ago
💡Not sure if this helps, but Ruby Standard Gems is always a great source of reference. I use it often, myself.
Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Assigned
- Assignee set to hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)
Updated by chooosen (Piotr Wasiak) almost 3 years ago
:+1:
Documentation would solve probably my question about:
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18400
Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) almost 2 years ago
I'll document this.
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
This has been documented in doc/standard_library.rdoc.
Actions
Like2
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0