Bug #20995
closedexception escapes block given to IO.popen("-") in child process
Description
I was surprised by the "ensure" being reached in the child process here:
martind@stormy:~/tmp/D161730$ cat repro.rb
#!/usr/bin/ruby -w
parent = Process.pid()
[false, true].each() {
|nauseous|
$stderr.puts("#{nauseous ? "" : "not "}raising exception from child:")
begin
IO.popen("-") {
|io|
unless io
if nauseous
raise("childish fit")
end
end
}
ensure
$stderr.puts("in finalization block from #{Process.pid() == parent ? "parent" : "child"}")
$stderr.puts()
end
}
martind@stormy:~/tmp/D161730$ ~/download/ruby-3.3.4/ruby --version
ruby 3.3.4 (2024-07-09 revision be1089c8ec) [x86_64-linux]
martind@stormy:~/tmp/D161730$ ~/download/ruby-3.3.4/ruby -w repro.rb
not raising exception from child:
in finalization block from parent
raising exception from child:
in finalization block from child
repro.rb:11:in `block (2 levels) in <main>': childish fit (RuntimeError)
from repro.rb:7:in `popen'
from repro.rb:7:in `block in <main>'
from repro.rb:3:in `each'
from repro.rb:3:in `<main>'
in finalization block from parent
martind@stormy:~/tmp/D161730$
In the first iteration of the loop, we don't see the surprise - the child process exits when the block is completed. Only when an exception is thrown, in the second iteration, does the control flow escape from the block. It does so even for the SystemExit exception raised by exit(0) but not, as we see above, from just leaving the block (in which case perhaps we _exit(0) at https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/io.c#L8044). My expectation was that the block would be executed in the child process much like the "main" part of a program, with the usual unhandled exception reporting, which we see demonstrated above, being invoked as soon as the exception propagated out the block, rather than first unwinding the callers.
I think the behavior is unchanged since the oldest version I was conveniently able to test, which was:
ruby 1.8.7 (2012-02-08 patchlevel 358) [x86_64-linux]
... so I didn't file this report as a Bug in case users have (accidentally?) come to depend on the behavior. I didn't find any mention of this at eg https://ruby-doc.org/3.4.1/IO.html#method-c-popen but I didn't file this report as a Feature request for the documentation in case the documentation deliberately leaves open such possibilities. I didn't even find anyone else puzzling over this behavior on eg StackOverflow, but I felt that I should report it for the benefit of the next poor sap to run into it, especially in case that's Future Me. Could it be a case where a warning would be worth more than the trouble it causes?