Bug #8854
closed
Update URL for bug reports
Description
The URL in error.c has recently been changed from
www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html to bugs.ruby-lang.org.
I am guessing(!) that the URL in test/ruby/test_rubyoptions.rb
should match the URL in error.c, see patch.
I couldn't test this, though.
Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) about 12 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
This issue was solved with changeset r42803.
Marcus, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.
Revert r42800 "* error.c: [DOC] Update bug tracker url by @ScotterC [Fixes GH-390]"
It should be fixed on www.ruby-lang.org side.
- [Bug #8854]
- ruby/www.ruby-lang.org#288 https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/issues/288
Updated by stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer) about 12 years ago
The state is inconsistent now :), test/ruby/test_rubyoptions.rb has been adopted in r42802.
bugs.ruby-lang.org is referenced in multiple places. Why not switch to it completely and additionally keep a redirect from www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html for users of older revisions?
Updated by zzak (zzak _) about 12 years ago
If bugreport.html only exists as a redirect then we should reference the actual bug tracker in documentation.
Unless the goal was to link to a page with details on how to report bugs. In this case it should be at this bugreport.html address
Updated by stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer) about 12 years ago
bugreport.html does not exist (I do not know since when), and we set up a redirect to bugs.ruby-lang.org earlier today.
Updated by stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer) about 12 years ago
@naruse (Yui NARUSE), @zzak (zzak _)
I propose to (again) change error.c to match r42802 (i.e. using 'bugs.ruby-lang.org').
Updated by znz (Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA) about 12 years ago
Snapshots in http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html
redirect to http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/HowToReport before jekyll.
Updated by zzak (zzak _) about 12 years ago
I would like to discuss this as a feature: #8931